Archives for posts with tag: rights

IF women had done a bit of research regarding the ‘Women’s March’, perhaps they would have felt a bit different about the whole matter.

The following article, quoted directly below, can be found at: http://www.angrypatriotmovement.com/womans-march-terrorism-link/

ALERT – Woman Behind Anti-Trump ‘Women’s March’ Linked to THIS Terrorist Organization

There were around 200,000 people who went to D.C. for the “Women’s March” on Saturday, many of whom probably didn’t realize the organizer of the event has ties to terrorism.

Linda Sarsour is a Pro-Palestine Muslim activist with ties to the terrorist group Hamas. She also wants Sharia law instilled in America. (via Daily Caller)

She is very adamant about sharing her support for Palestine, as well as her hatred of Israel. She has been recently seen with an alleged financier of Hamas at a Muslim convention in Chicago, posing and taking pictures.

Sarsour is the head of the Arab American Association in New York, she was also the Obama White House “Champion of Change.” She even spoke at the annual convention of the Muslim American Society and the Islamic Circle of North America.

When she was at this convention, she took pictures with Salah Sarsour, a former Hamas operative who was imprisoned in Israel in the 90s because of his actions in the terrorist group. Right now, he is a member of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee.

Sarsour spreads her Sharia Law activism on Twitter, many of her tweets denote the “good points” of Sharia Law, like how you will supposedly not pay any interest on your loans. Honestly, I’d rather pay interest than have inequality between the genders, or have stoning as a punishment for adultery!

It’s rather ironic that someone who is pro-Sharia Law is one of the organizers of the Women’s March. Sharia Law is what dictates that women have to cover their hair, that women don’t have the same rights as men, and is the legal system that allows women to suffer abuse and unfairness.

Yet, they are protesting Donald Trump, who has never and would never threaten women’s rights.

I understand that women are feeling threatened because they believe the lies of the mainstream media. Well, the very person who is leading you wants to see all of your rights eroded. That’s not something the media can hide.

All those rights that women have worked for, they won’t be going down the drain with President Trump; they will be going down because of people like Sarsour who wish to implement their heinous belief, that a woman is a second-class citizen, onto the rest of the world.

You don’t have to like Donald Trump, and you don’t have to believe that he’s going to make America better. It doesn’t matter, because he will make America better even though the liberals will be kicking and screaming along the way. But Sharia Law will never have a place in this country, especially while Donald Trump resides in the Oval Office.

Many are attempting to claim that the following words are the same:

Unalienable and Inalienable

They are NOT.

Here’s the difference:

“Unalienable: incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred.”

Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, pg. 1523

“You cannot surrender, sell or transfer unalienable rights, they are a gift from the creator to the individual and cannot under ANY circumstances be surrendered or taken. All individual’s have unalienable rights.”

_________________________________

“Inalienable rights: Rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights.” Morrison v. State, Mo. App. 252 S.W. 2d 97, 101

“You can surrender, sell or transfer inalienable rights if you consent either actually or constructively. Inalienable rights are not inherent in man and can be alienated by government. Persons have inalienable rights. Most state constitutions recognize only inalienable rights.

There is a huge difference between the two definitions.

Many make the mistake of using ‘inalienable’ when speaking of our Constitutional rights. In truth, our rights are UNalienable, and our Constitution does NOT give us these rightsOur Constitution PROTECTS our rights by affirming that no one can take them because they are Creator-given. Our unalienable rights include the right to bear arms, among many, many others.

It is NOT the Constitution that gives us that right; that right was Creator given, so as to protect us from tyrannical governments and for self-defense.

The Constitution of the united States does not give rightsit is a guarantee of our Creator given rights, not a giver of those rights.
The Declaration of Independence states that our rights are UNalienable. Our Founding Fathers were very meticulous in choosing the appropriate words in our critical documents.

The Constitution states that they cannot be infringed upon by anyone, nor any government, nor other entity.

In addition, these rights were NOT “handed to us through laws of the United States Constitution, the Magna Carta, and other documents from antiquity and historical situations wherein mankind fought, suffered, and died to win these freedoms”, as some have stated. These rights are strictly gifts given to the individual- by the Creator.

The Constitution of the united States is a stated guarantee that those inherent rights cannot be sold, transferred, infringed, nor surrendered, and cannot, under ANY circumstances, be surrendered or taken. They belong to the individual. (which is defined as being different than ‘person’ ; a corporation has certain rights that pertain to a ‘person’; individuals are the ‘createe’ of the Creator).

It is critical that we do not lose sight of the true definition of this crucial word ‘unalienable’.

Many are of the opinion, erroneously, that the two are interchangable- they are not, and were never meant to be confused. They definitely do not mean the same thing, as so many would try to have us believe.

It is imperative that we remain diligent and mindful of this fact.

According to Our Constitution,”No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

First we must remember:
*“The common law of England is not the common law of these States.” –George Mason

*One universal point most all early publicists agreed on was natural-born citizen must mean one who is a citizen by no act of law. If a person owes their citizenship to some act of law (naturalization for example), they cannot be considered a natural-born citizen. This leads us to defining natural-born citizen under the laws of nature – laws the founders recognized and embraced.

*Under the laws of nature, every child born requires no act of law to establish the fact the child inherits through nature his/her father’s citizenship as well as his name (or even his property) through birth. This law of nature is also recognized by law of nations. Sen. Howard said the citizenship clause under the Fourteenth Amendment was by virtue of “natural law and national law.”

 

Obama’s father was born in British East Africa Protectorate, as of 1895 (now known as Kenya, as of 1963)- in 1920, the Protectorate changed it’s name to the Colony of Kenya, but it was still under British rule. Obama inherited his citizenship from his father, making him a citizen of the Colony of Kenya, under British rule.Obama, therefore, inherited his father’s citizenship in British East Africa Protectorate, later known as the Colony of Kenya. It is irrelevant whether his mother was a US citizen, as they were married at the time of his birth. It is through the father that citizenship is decided.
That includes all these alleged ‘anchor babies’- if their father was a Mexican National at the time of the birth of a child, their children, even if born in the US, are NOT US citizens, contrary to popular myth. The exception to the use of the father’s status in deciding citizenship is if the child is illegitimate, in which case it is the mother’s status- if she is here illegally, and is a citizen of Mexico, the child is NOT a Natural-born child of the US. Location of birth is not the deciding factor of citizenship. The father must be a citizen of the US, and not of another nation/state; the same holds true for the mother of an illegitimate child. A child born in the US does not ‘automatically’ become a citizen solely by being born in the US; the father must be a citizen of the US, or, if an illegitimate birth, the mother must be a citizen of the US. If not, then the child is a citizen of wherever the parent was a citizen of prior to coming to the US.

*House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a ‘double allegiance.’ By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.”

*Rep. John A. Bingham commenting on Section 1992 said it means “every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866)

**Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94 (1884) @ 101-102 states that:
“The main object of the opening sentence of the fourteenth amendment was …to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black, and whether formerly slaves or not, born or naturalized in the United States, and OWING NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ALIEN POWER, should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 73; Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 306.”

**Under Constitutional Intent of the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Article 2.1.5, the successful US Government Attorney of later Wong Kim Ark fame shows us that the Paternal Link (that through the Father’s Status) is essential in determining who is or is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen:
“Birth, therefore, does not ipso facto confer citizenship, and is essential in order that a person be a native or natural born citizen of the United States, that his father be at the time of the birth of such person a citizen thereof, or in the case he be illegitimate, that his mother be a citizen thereof at the time of such birth.” – GEORGE D. COLLINS, SAN FRANCISCO, CAL.”                                                            (ipso facto means ‘by the fact itself’)

 

Obama is not legally in office- he has usurped his position and needs to be immediately removed. He is then to be charged with perjury, and all the other impeachable offenses he has done, tried, and punished. Everything he has done is void.

**As for Congress winking at the Law and ignoring the Constitution regarding the Natural Born Citizenship requirement clause in the Constitution:

**Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973) @ 272 “It is clear, of course, that no Act of Congress can authorize a violation of the Constitution.”

**Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886) @442 “…an unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

**Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) @ 180 “… in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned, and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank.
Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.

**U.S. Constitution, Article. VI. “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution.…”

 

If any refuse to uphold the Constitution, they are to be removed immediately.

In our Declaration of Independence, we stated “WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. “

IT IS TIME for America’s peoples to uphold our rights!!
That also means that Rafael Edward ‘Ted’ Cruz, Marco Antonio Rubio, and Piyush ‘Bobby’ Jindal are also NOT eligible.

  • Cruz’s father was a citizen of Cuba at the time of his birth.(his father didn’t get Canadian citizenship until 1973;his son was born in Canada in 1970). Even if his father had later become a US citizen, and was able to pass that to his son, he would be a naturalized citizen, Not a Natural born citizen. It is the father’s citizenship at the time of birth that is the deciding factor.
  • Neither of Marco Rubio’s parents were US citizens at the time of his birth. They were naturalized in 1975. He, if his father’s status after 1975 passed to him, he would be a ‘naturalized citizen. Naturalized is not the same as a Natural born citizen.
  • Bobby Jindal’s father was a native citizen of India, arriving in the US 6 months prior to Jindal’s birth. Neither parent was a US citizen at the time of his birth. Even if his parents later became citizens, and his father was able to pass that along to him, he would be a ‘Naturalized citizen’, and not a Natural born citizen.
  • Obama’s father was a citizen of British East Africa Protectorate, as of 1895 (now known as Kenya, as of 1963)- in 1920, the Protectorate changed it’s name to the Colony of Kenya, but it was still under British rule. Obama inherited his citizenship from his father, making him a citizen of the Colony of Kenya, under British rule. He is not a Natural born citizen.

*When a child inherits the citizenship of their father, they become a natural-born citizen of the nation their father belongs regardless of where they might be born. It should be pointed out that citizenship through descent of the father was recognized by U.S. Naturalization law whereby children became citizens themselves as soon as their father had become a naturalized citizen, or were born in another country to a citizen father.

*Yes, birth is prima facie evidence of citizenship, but only the citizenship of the nation the father is a member.

*UPDATE: In regards to questions about the citizenship of the mother: Mothers citizenship rarely ever influenced the citizenship of their children except in certain situations such as the father dying before the child was born or when the identity of the father was unknown.

*Prior to the Revolutionary War place of birth within the dominions of the crown was the principle criterion for establishing perpetual allegiance to the King, however natural citizenship via birth could require being born to a British subject depending on the era in question. After independence this perpetual allegiance to the crown was abandoned for the principle of expatriation.

*It should be noted this allegiance due under England’s common law and American law are of two different species. Under the common law one owed a personal allegiance to the King as an individual upon birth for which could never be thrown off. Under the American system there was no individual ruler to owe a perpetual personal allegiance to.

*Furthermore, unlike the British practice, States required everyone including aliens to take an oath of allegiance to the State as a condition of residency. Children born to these residents were considered born into the allegiance of the State. In addition to this, States also had specific laws that banned citizenship to alien born who were not resident aliens who had declared their allegiance. New York for example, responded through enactment of a law to the ruling in Lynch v. Clarke (1844) that had used common law rules of citizenship by birth to specifically exclude children born to “transient aliens, and of alien public ministers and consuls, etc.”

*In other words, unlike under the common law, birth by itself did not create allegiance to anyone due merely to locality.

* Temporary sojourners like transient aliens were a description applied to aliens other than resident aliens. The difference being temporary aliens were here for temporary purposes, such as work, travel, visitation or school, who had no desire to become citizens or was prevented from becoming citizens by law. Resident aliens were those who desired to become citizens and had renounced their prior allegiances and had taken the legal steps to become citizens or reside within some state per state law.

 

*”The local or municipal authorities form distinct and independent portions of the supremacy, no more subject, within their respective spheres, to the general authority is subject to them within its own sphere. In this relation, then, the proposed government cannot be deemed a national one, since its jurisdiction extends to certain enumerated objects only, and leaves to the several States a residuary and inviolable sovereignty over all objects.” –James Madison ”

 

Note:  * quoted directly from:

http://www.federalistblog.us/2008/11/natural-born_citizen_defined/

Note:  ** quoted directly from:

http://www.wordsforgood.org/mirrors/educate-yourself.org/cn/Ted-Cruz-and-Marco-Rubio-Are-Constitutionally-Ineligible-to-Run-for-US-President10aug15.shtml

Feel free to look up the specific quotes regarding the decisions related to Natural born citizen. The legal opinions specifically addressing the issue are defined within the above information. Other quotes are directly from The Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

Received this earlier today in an email:

“Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Deal Reached, Tell Congress To Vote NAY!

On Monday, October 5, 2015, U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman announced that the United States and 11 other Pacific Rim nations have finally reached an agreement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). “We, the trade ministers of Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, United States, and Vietnam are pleased to announce that we have successfully concluded the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiation,” said U.S. Trade Representative Froman at the Trans-Pacific Partnership Ministerial Press Conference, held in Atlanta, Georgia.

With a consensus now reached among the 12 participatory TPP nations, a final official text of the TPP is soon expected to be drafted prior to reaching lawmakers. According to Congressional Quarterly (CQ), “Officials still have to draft and review what they have agreed in principle.”

Although CQ also states that “Congress is likely to vote on the agreement in early 2016,” Congressional lawmakers could in fact vote on the agreement as early as this year (2015) pending how quickly the final TPP text is drafted and subsequently transmitted to Congress. The New York Times estimates that the “full 30-chapter text will not be available for perhaps a month.”

Congress’ narrow passage of Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) or “fast track” earlier this year, ensures an expedited up-or-down vote without debate or amendment for the final TPP agreement.

As The New American magazine noted in an online article, posted on March 31, 2015, about WikiLeaks unauthorized release of key chapters of the TPP agreement, one of the most obviously objectionable portions of the TPP texts is the outrageous assertion that the documents remain secret even after they are finally passed! The New American reported:

Not only are the negotiations being conducted in secrecy, and not only are the TPP text documents being withheld from the public and the public’s elected representatives, but even more outrageous is the effort by the TPP negotiators to keep the agreement (or at least certain portions of the agreement and the negotiating process) secret for four years after it goes into effect!

Chapter 2 of the TPP text begins the following classification notice:

Derived from: Classification Guidance
dated March 4, 2010
Reason: 1.4(b)
Declassify on: Four years from entry into
force of the TPP agreement or,
if no agreement enters into
force, four years from the close
of the negotiations.* This document must be protected from
unauthorized disclosure, but may be mailed or
transmitted over unclassified e-mail or fax,
discussed over unsecured phone lines, and
stored on unclassified computer systems. It
must be stored in a locked or secured building,
room, or container.

Despite Froman’s announcement of a final TPP accord reached, its text is likely to remain classified from the American public for several years even after they have been passed by Congress. Although the full contents of what has been agreed to may not become known for several years, we already do know some of the provisions contained in the insidious anti-sovereignty TPP agreement thanks to the courageousness of certain statesmen who have read the agreement.

After visiting the secret reading room where a draft copy of the TPP is housed, in Congress, Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Alab.) wrote an open letter to President Obama, inquiring and warning about how the TPP “creates a new transnational governance structure known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership Commission.” Of the secretive proposed TPP Commission, Sen. Sessions further elaborated and likening it the European Union (EU), “The details of this new governance commission are extremely broad and have the hallmarks of a nascent European Union, with many similarities.”

The governing executive body of the EU is the European Commission (EC). And like the TPP, the EU also began as an ostensibly simple trade agreement known as the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) in 1952, established by the Treaty of Paris the previous year.

Considering the rapid growth and transformation of the ECSC into the supranational entity that the EU is today, we dare not take Senator Sessions’ concerns lightly. Henceforth, it is imperative that we put a stop to it by contacting our congressional lawmakers and urge them to oppose final passage of the TPP.

Please phone your representative (202-225-3121) and senators (202-224-3121) in opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, which would abrogate U.S. national sovereignty and independence to a supranational EU-style Trans-Pacific Union.

[NOTE: this article is courtesy of JBS- please share with all you know and encourage them to act right away to convince our Representatives to vote NAY on TPP.]

For  other important Action Alerts, go to:                                                                        http://www.jbs.org/federal-legislative-action-alerts

Please CONTACT your representative and senators and urge them to oppose and vote NAY on passage of the final TPP agreement.

You can send an editable email to them via this site:

http://www.jbs.org/federal-legislative-action-alerts?vvsrc=%2fCampaigns%2f42807%2fRespond

and/or find and contact them via:

http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

There is very little time to contact your Representatives and urge them to vote NAY, so please act right away.  It is critical that we preserve our sovereignty and do NOT get entangled  in this deceptively dangerous ‘partnership’ that will strip away our rights.

The only way to right our country is by personal action. ‘WE the people’ are every one of us, and we have a duty to ourselves to actively engage in making our country work the way it was intended. WE are the ones responsible for our freedom and our future. The tools to protect us are in OUR hands- Let us use them often and wisely.

THIS IS AN URGENT MATTER. PLEASE ACT NOW!

Often these matters are decided on nights and week-ends, so DO NOT DELAY! Get those emails sent! Get those calls made! Leave messages if necessary. ACT NOW! Flood our Representatives offices with calls and emails! WE MUST get them to vote NAY on TPP!

It is extremely detrimental to us all to have this ‘purging of our military’ happening. It is happening at an unprecedented rate.

Clearly the communistic goals have been seeping in at an alarming rate
(see previous post ‘Scammed AGAIN’ and ‘NYC-headed to a war zone?’)

It is understandable that many think that it may well lead to the country revolting- but that is EXACTLY what the Communist Party wants us to do. They tell those who ‘accept’ the Party that violence is the ONLY way that they will achieve the ‘change’ they want(OWG).

Obviously, we must re-build America by the same methods the Party have
snuck in on us all in order to destroy America (and other nations, as well), and AVOID the violence!

Otherwise, the FEMA camps and UN takeover/communist takeover WILL get their way.

Use their very same strategy to reverse what has been going on – then we can get our strength back and send them packing. All of the following can be done in a minimal amount of time:

1) Re-educate the public
2) let them know we aren’t intimated by them and WOULD use atomic/nuclear military effort to sustain the US
3) ARM the people and teach them to use those arms effectively
4) stop all trade with communist countries
5) call all the loans in to any communist and any communist-sympathizer country
6) stop any and all aid to communist countries
7) leave the UN and get the UN removed from US soil
8) end arms negotiations
9) pass strong laws forbidding the communist agenda propaganda in this country (outlawing it permanently with heavy punishment levied)
10) close all military and patent information to them
11) do away with political parties (with a NO CONFIDENCE vote) and just have individuals running for office, and dis-allow any $ backing (allow only unbiased, uncontrolled media spewing what the runners are about as a public service)
12) get law of the land to stand above any tweaking of laws that has been used (the Party has been claiming it was a civil rights violation)
13) promote homeschooling and private education, and
14) outlaw any communist agenda propaganda in public schools/student newspapers,etc.
15) institute severe punishment for communist incited/supported riots
16) shut down all newspapers, media, motion pictures that adhere to communist agenda and promote small independent locally-owned media to replace it
17) tear down ugly art(replacing it with beautiful art)
18) remove all communists from controlling offices in all sectors
19) promote healthy and morally sound lifestyles and values (and punish deviant behavior)
20) support wholesome religion choice
21) definitely support the ideals of our Founding Fathers and the Constitution
22) make the real history of our nation a requirement in education
23) support individual nations inherent cultures (Stop pushing multi-culturalism and homogenization of peoples)
24) show the dangers of socialism and communism and promote individual strength
25) Cut all ties with the Rothschilds and their ilk, and send them packing
26) institute our own currency backed by something better than air
27) close the Federal Reserve Bank, audit them, give the money back to the people, and kick the FRB, IMF, etc. out of the country
28) close the borders and kick out all illegals after fining them for
breaking our laws
29) expose ‘American Corporations’ owned by foreigners, and
force them out
30) re-instate all military officers that have been ‘dismissed’ because of political agenda
31) re-build our military strength and arsenals. and build new and strong ships and other needed equipment and weaponry
32) replace all communist controlled offices within our government, our museums, our ‘social services’, industries, and unions, etc.
33) eliminate socialist programs
34) remove psychology and their psuedo ‘professionals’ and send them packing
35) re-vamp the EPA, FDA, etc- repeal Codex, assuring all products will do no harm
36) promote family, self-reliance, small business, small farming, individual and state’s rights

Other countries would follow suit once we’ve acted. Oh, and disarm them-
even if we have to blow them sky-high to accomplish that.

We do NOT have to engage in a ‘violent’ revolution to accomplish this- we can do it
as stealthily as they have- THAT would really get to them, to NOT fall into
their trap.
They want nothing more than to engage us in a war amongst ourselves.

We can do this most effectively by re-instituting our values and forbidding theirs, clean house, so to speak, and once they are out, blow their ‘military might’ to kingdom come.
Strict border control afterwards, with thorough background checks done by those
who value America for it’s Liberty.

They are too well positioned to fight in a revolution, as they have
been infiltrating and stashing weapons for many years.

Remember how and why communism introduced and what results these controllers had in mind by doing so. (see links on earlier post entitled ‘NYC- heading to a war zone?’)

We must just take over from the inside out- just like they did. Non-violently.

The definition of scammed is to be deceived, defrauded, swindled – often by manipulation or trickery. Perhaps we are far more manipulated than we’d like to believe.

Yes, we know about the marketing strategies used commonly to get us to buy products. How many are aware of the mass manipulation to get us to believe and behave in a certain way? If the truth were exposed, would we still think that these cultural and societal changes were due to our own
‘independent’ choices?
Let’s see.
Webmaster Forest Glen Durland located a document quoted in the book mentioned below at a library. The document is now over half a century old. He lists his sources as:

Microfilm: California State University at San Jose Clark Library, Government Floor Phone (408)924-2770 Microfilm Call Number: J 11.R5

Congressional Record, Vol. 109 88th Congress, 1st Session Appendix Pages A1-A2842 Jan. 9-May 7, 1963 Reel 12

Please PAY ATTENTION to how much of this agenda has already been pushed into our lives.

The following is an excerpt from the book written by Cleon Skousen, outlining 45 goals which found their way into the halls of the United States Capitol in 1963, and are now part of the Congressional Record (see details following). These are the listed goals :

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use [“]united force[“] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963

About the Book:
Book:
The Naked Communist
Author W. Cleon Skousen
Country United States
Language English
Genre Non-fiction
Published 1958, 2014 (Ensign Publishing Company)
Pages 412
ISBN 978-1630720612
Dewey Decimal 335.4 22
LC Class HX44 .S5585 2009

Please Note the Date of his book…1958
Further investigation will turn up dates in the early 1940’s. So for over a half a century, we have been duped into thinking we are making independent choices, when, in fact, most of the choices we have made- multiculturalism, trade and commerce, toleration of sexual deviation, etc. – was ALL part of a plan to MAKE us turn our backs on liberty and freedom and accept a COMMUNISTIC ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT!
The ultimate plan will undo all these false securities they have set into motion, so NO, things will NOT be better if we keep accepting these forced changes.

And they are forced changes. Any time one is scammed, they are forced by manipulation and trickery into doing something that is not in their best interest. They are deceived, defrauded, swindled. Fleeced.

Is THIS the direction we REALLY WANT to be pushed? OR shall we re-claim our individual and national pride, and culture? Shall we pull our heads from the fog of manipulation and assert our own free-will choices and reclaim our independence and freedom?

Perhaps it is time to OUST the scammers, assert our liberty, and safeguard all our, and our children’s, future.

Should we decide to rid ourselves of these parasites, we must do so peaceably, since reacting with violence is just what these oppressors would want us to do. They came amongst us in guise; let us remove them likewise.

%d bloggers like this: