Archives for posts with tag: DOJ

Received this today:

AND SO IT BEGINS – THE FIX IS IN – MEULLER and COMEY

The Washington Post, a mouthpiece for Obama holdovers in the CIA and other agencies, reports that “sources” say a current White House official is under investigation as “a significant person of interest” in Russia-gate, but that the sources “would not further identify the official.”

     This is a case of anonymous officials talking about an anonymous official.

     Interestingly, the term “person of interest” was used by the FBI against scientist Steven Hatfill in the post-9/11anthrax letters case. He was totally innocent and the Department of Justice paid him $5.8 million in damages.

     The new Russia-gate special counsel, former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, presided over this fiasco

     After dismissing Hatfill and several others as suspects, the FBI blamed a dead U.S. Army scientist, Bruce Ivins. However, evidence indicates that the more likely culprits were al-Qaeda operatives who got the anthrax from a U.S. lab. The truth was too embarrassing for the FBI to reveal.

     The new Russia-gate special counsel, former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, presided over this fiasco. What’s more, Mueller was sued for malfeasance in the case by FBI agent Richard Lambert who was put in charge of the anthrax investigation.

     Yet, here is what we read about Mueller, who was FBI director under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama:

     “Widely respected by members of both parties” and “an unflinching advocate for facts,” claims The New York Times.

     “Skilled and upright,” writes Kimberley A. Strassel of The Wall Street Journal.

     “Widely respected” and “highly regarded by both parties,” writes Andrew McCarthy of National Review.

“    Uniquely suited to the task,” says The Washington Post.

     These comments reflect the consensus of what President Trump would call the “swamp.”

     A New York Times editorial was titled “Robert Mueller: The Special Counsel America Needs.” Making no mention of the anthrax debacle, it called Mueller “one of the few people with the experience, stature and reputation to see the job through.”

     Anthrax case: Comey and Mueller badly bungled the biggest case they ever handled

     A far different opinion is offered by Carl M. Cannon, executive editor and Washington Bureau chief of RealClearPolitics, who noted that the FBI director fired by Trump, James Comey, and Mueller “have a long history as professional allies. For Mueller to be brought in to investigate the behavior of the guy who sacked Comey seems a conflict of interest.”

     Cannon pointed to their work on the anthrax case, saying, “Comey and Mueller badly bungled the biggest case they ever handled. They botched the investigation of the 2001 anthrax letter attacks that took five lives and infected 17 other people…”

     Like Mueller, Comey, who was deputy attorney general, declared Hatfill guilty.

     Leaving aside Comey’s mishandling of another major investigation, the Hillary emails, consider his conduct and behavior.

     While President Trump has been attacked for calling Comey a “nut job” and “crazy,” Comey friend Benjamin Wittes says the former FBI director tried to hide in the curtains during a White House visit for a ceremony honoring law enforcement officials who provided security at the inauguration.

     The New York Times reported, “Mr. Comey—who is 6 feet 8 inches tall and was wearing a dark blue suit that day—told Mr. Wittes that he tried to blend in with the blue curtains in the back of the room, in the hopes that Mr. Trump would not spot him and call him out.”

     Reporters would rather write about the drapes than investigate the corruption under Comey and his predecessor, Mueller

     Was the 6 foot 8 inch Comey so crazy that he went to a White House event with Trump but tried to hide from him in the drapes?

     Wittes, in his own words, says that Comey “felt that he could not refuse a presidential invitation, particularly not one that went to a broad array of law enforcement leadership. So he went. But as he told me the story, he tried hard to blend into the background and avoid any one-on-one interaction. He was wearing a blue blazer and noticed that the drapes were blue. So he stood in the back, right in front of the drapes, hoping Trump wouldn’t notice him camouflaged against the wall. If you look at the video, Comey is standing about as far from Trump as it is physically possible to be in that room.”

     However, Comey was wearing a red tie that stood out like a sore thumb. His suit was darker than the drapes. Plus, Comey is so tall that he is hard to ignore, even with drapes behind him. Frankly this is nothing more than a diversion from the real issue—FBI corruption.

     Reporters would rather write about the drapes than investigate the corruption under Comey and his predecessor, Mueller.

     Who is Benjamin Wittes? He is the co-author of The Future of Violence: Robots and Germs, Hackers and Drones—Confronting A New Age of Threat. He discusses the anthrax attacks in the book.

     Five years after the FBI “closed” the case, Wittes doesn’t seem to accept the verdict that Bruce Ivins was the villain. He refers to Ivins as the FBI’s “suspect,” quickly adding, “or whoever else may have been responsible for the attacks.”

     So why didn’t Comey reopen the case? One possible explanation is that he didn’t want to upset Mueller and the FBI officials who engaged in the cover-up. He had approved their targeting of, and conclusions about, Hatfill.

     In return, Mueller, as special counsel in Russia-gate, can be expected to do Comey a big favor. He will not probe Comey’s malfeasance in using the phony “Trump Dossier” to investigate President Trump and his team. That is the real story—how Hillary donors financed by pro-Russian interests hired a former British agent to concoct an assortment of charges against Trump.

     Mueller is a company man; he will protect the FBI and its former director and friend. The fix is in.

     This is a far more important story than Comey hiding in the drapes. Writing about drapes may sound silly, but it is yet another way for the media to suggest that Comey was afraid of Trump trying to influence his inquiry into Russia-gate.

     The story is not how Trump influenced the investigation, but rather how Comey used the phony “Trump Dossier” to go down dead-end roads

     The story is not how Trump influenced the investigation, but rather how Comey used the phony “Trump Dossier” to go down dead-end roads and produce no results. It’s the anthrax investigation all over again.

     Mueller’s job is to pump life into Comey’s fiasco, and turn the tables on Trump for firing Comey.

     Meanwhile, corruption in the FBI goes unreported, and Congress fails to do adequate oversight of the intelligence community, which is supposed to keep us safe.

     Retired Foreign Service officer and intelligence analyst Kenneth J. Dillon told Accuracy in Media, “My research on the 2011 anthrax mailings case suggests that Mueller was responsible for the suicide of the alleged but wrongly accused mailer, Bruce Ivins, as well as for the subsequent cover-up. Mueller appears to have lied to a Senate committee about Ivins, and destroyed key alibi evidence for him. The new FBI director needs to reopen the anthrax mailings investigation and get to the bottom of this shocking and outrageous case.”

     Dillon’s research indicates that Ivins prepared the anthrax to test vaccines, but the anthrax was sent to various civilian labs, including one infiltrated by an al-Qaeda operative. The anthrax was transferred to another al-Qaeda operative, Abderraouf Jdey, and used in the attacks. “There was a very lax attitude in the pre-9/11 era relating to the handling of anthrax,” Dillon says.

     Why would this fact be suppressed? “The FBI was embarrassed by the fact that they had detained Jdey in August of 2001 and had let him go,” he says. Jdey was free, not only to mail the anthrax letters but according to Dillon’s theory, he went on to become the shoebomber on Flight 587, which crashed on November 12, 2001, and was conveniently blamed on co-pilot error.

     “If indeed Abderraouf Jdey brought down Flight 587 with a shoe bomb, the U.S. Government would have been deeply negligent in permitting an al Qaeda operative whose whereabouts were known to carry out this attack,” Dillon notes.

     Mueller has fooled a lot of people. His appointment is good news for the Swamp but bad news for Trump.

     Carl M. Cannon seems to think the outcome is preordained, noting the attitude of “official Washington” and what the “insiders” want to see happen—impeachment leading to Trump’s ouster.

     Unless Trump picks a new FBI director who will get to the bottom of the FBI’s corruption by shining the light on the mishandling of the anthrax probe, Trump may be hiding in the drapes before the Russia-gate investigation is over.

Advertisements

Let’s see what these immigrants are up to, shall we?

Written  and posted (Jan. 16, 2015 at http://madworldnews.com/muslim-no-go-zones/ ) by  Journalist Brandon Walker, the following article was received via e-mail from a veteran earlier this year:

“OBAMA AND HOLDER IGNORE MUSLIM “NO GO” ZONES ALREADY OPERATING IN THE U.S.

What makes anyone think Holder or the DOJ is going to do anything to upset the Islamic Apple Cart?

http://madworldnews.com/muslim-no-go-zones/

Muslim “No Go Zones” Already Established In U.S., DOJ Knows & Does Nothing

Muslim "No Go Zones" Already Established In US, DOJ Knows And Does Nothing

We have seen and heard of the Muslim “no go zones” in France (pictured above) and other areas of Europe, but did you know there are Muslim “no go zones” already established in the United States? Now, you may be wondering why no one has contacted the Department of Justice. The DOJ already knows these zones are here, but they have done nothing about them.

On January 15, PBS Newshour ran a story that homegrown terrorism worries North American analysts  in the US and Canada. Even ABC is covering the threat of homegrown terrorists, saying it is very real. Members of Congress are stating that it is not a matter of if we will have another terrorist attack on our soil, it’s when. Even the DOJ is warning that attacks are coming. Perhaps they have known all along.

As we covered in the story we broke about the 22 Jihad training camps in the U.S., there are Muslims of America (MOA) right here on U.S. soil. More accurately they are Jamaat ul-Fuqra, a Pakastan Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda related branch. There are 35 compounds in the United States, 22 of which are confirmed in 9 different states as listed by the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) documents that state they have been concerned about them since 1991.

The FBI can not act because the President Obama and the Department of Homeland Security will not classify MOA, with known ties for decades to Jamaat ul-Fuqra, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization despite a mountain of evidence. Even more disturbing, there is evidence that some Homeland Security and law enforcement officials belong to these compounds.

Muslim "No Go Zones" Already Established In US, DOJ Knows And Does Nothing

Martin Mawyer, president of the Christian Action Network, knows first hand what happens when you try to approach these compounds as a member of the press.

They are not the only ones snubbed or attacked. Ironically, members of the press, Christians, and infidels get better treatment and more freedom of the press in the European “no go zones” than the ones established by MOA right here in the land of the First Amendment. In Europe, they allow discussion, and you can walk in and talk to people. It is obviously not suggested to walk into them and carry signs insulting Muhammad.

However, approach one of the compounds in the United States with a camera and you will be met by force. If you call them for comment, they refuse to respond.

It is not like the violence and the training is not known. In April 2012, Heritage Foundation released information on fifty terrorist plots stemming from MOA since 9/11. They became one of the first organizations to track thwarted terrorist attacks against the United States. When they started tracking the attacks in 2007, there were 19 foiled attacks that year alone.

In 2009, Christian Action Network actually got possession of and released a training video from Hancock, New York.

MOA sued Christian Action Network over the release of the video and attacked one of their cameramen. The judge subsequently dismissed the lawsuit.

Martin Mawyer also released the book  Twilight In America. Muslims of America sued again over the release of the book. The lawsuit was dismissed by a federal judge in April, though leaders of MOA have asked the court to reconsider its dismissal. A ruling is expected later this month.

Law Enforcement Today chronicled the camps in 2012 and the danger they pose.

More than 90 percent of the women are on state benefits, Aziz claims, with a portion of this money going back to Sheikh Gilani in Pakistan. “They have so many kids,” he said of the women. “Eight kids. Nine kids. They have to raise them and they don’t have a lot.”

Not a lot of money. Not a lot of housing. Frequent brutality from their husbands. And a lot of kids. That’s a woman’s fate on the camps. (Law Enforcement Today)

What Pamela Geller uncovered for WND makes the situation in the compounds a scenario that would have made the 1930’s Chicago Mafia envious. Members have become local law enforcement officers in Texas, New York, and Virginia around these compounds as well as others.

Problems with the U.S. immigration system pose addition risks. The Center for Immigration Studies recorded 41.3 million immigrants from July 2010 to July 2013 into the United States.

The nation’s immigrant population (legal and illegal) hit a record 41.3 million in July 2013, an increase of 1.4 million since July 2010. Since 2000 the immigrant population is up 10.2 million. (Center for Immigration Studies)

The FBI and DOJ tracks them as best they can, but as seen by the flood of the illegal “children” last year, they will get bus tickets to anywhere in the country and Immigration and Customs Enforcement are not able to track them. For the Muslim immigrants among them, these compounds give them the perfect location to go and train for attacks on the American public.

If you worry about the establishment of these “no go zones” in the United States, they are already here. The question should be for a nation that believes in freedom of the press, free speech, and the US Constitution, why are they allowed to exist?”

 Journalist Brandon Walker

NOTE: Although Obama claimed he was a Christian during the election, tapes were later made public that  showed Obama speaking to a  Muslim group and ‘stating’ that he was  raised a Muslim, was  educated as a Muslim, and is still a Muslim. Bear in mind, Obama previously had made this statement in his book Audacity of Hope, “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

%d bloggers like this: