It is absolutely incredible what some will attempt to do.

Currently, there are many who are being funded by the likes of George Soros and his multitude of falsely labeled ‘humanitarian’ organizations to cause as much division and unrest as possible. After all, a country divided is much easier to bring down than one who stands strongly united.

Yet these protesters- many of whom are paid to protest- do not see that they are being used. They never consider that ultimately, after their ‘purpose’ has been served, they will be discarded and come to the same ugly fate, by the very people paying them to protest today, as the rest of the populace that they are protesting against.

They do not consider that all this activity is deliberately designed to eventually work against them, as well as those they are targeting.

They never consider that the statutes they want to destroy are a testament to all of our history. Our history, together, as a nation of diverse peoples, belongs to all of our people. Once the history has been removed, those who are paying for the destruction, via protests, will re-write that history to ‘read’ whatever they choose it to be. That is dangerous because it causes people to disconnect from their ancestors, their past and our true history.

These same protestors are obviously unaware that America’s history is a history that actually had MORE white slaves than we ever had black ones.  They also are unaware that Robert E. Lee was a Democrat. They are disrespecting our history- a history we all share, be that good, bad, or indifferent. They do not have the right to destroy what belongs to all of us, yet that is what they are doing- taking our history away from all of us.

They will not stop there. No, there are those among these protestors that think someone (white) owes them- simply because of the color of their skin. Who, then, owes all the descendants of the white slaves, pray tell?

Now, we read in the Louisville Eccentric Observer, of one person, named Chennelle Helm, a self-proclaimed Black Lives Matter Louisville organizer, who is now demanding that white people give up their houses to black or brown people. She is stating that whites re-budget their finances so they can financially support black and/or brown people. She wants whites to will their inheritance to black or brown people, and promotes publicly harassing anyone who may be suspect as a racist.

Among other things. Seriously.

Perhaps  if she was willing to put half the energy into getting herself into a responsible financial position, rather than screaming for free handouts from those willing to work hard, she may feel entirely different about the matter. After all, doing so may enable her to purchase her own home, like so many – of all various colors – have done.

If one could directly speak to Ms. Helm, they may state something like:

Honey, NO ONE is going to save you- YOU have to save yourself. NO ONE OWES YOU ANYTHING. If you want something, you have to put in the time and effort to earn it.

Those are the lessons many home owners learned. And because they knew they were responsible for how they ultimately lived, they willingly put in the time and effort. Very few were ever ‘handed’ their home or their means of living. Most worked for it, and did what it took. They may not have even liked their jobs, but they stuck to it, and did what was required in order to secure the financing necessary to purchase their home.

And those who purchase homes pay their mortgage (‘rent’ owed to the bank) every month- on time- without the government doing it for them. They do not get assistance; they have to earn that money themselves (in addition to being taxed on their wages which enables the government to pay the assistance programs, like welfare, rent subsidy, food stamps and medicaid, to those who don’t chose to do the same). And then in 30 years or so, they FINALLY get the papers from the bank that says they NOW own that home. Sadly, darlin’, there is NO such thing as a ‘free lunch’. Even welfare recipients pay a price for that hand-out.

Just because you are among the ‘generational poor’ doesn’t mean YOU cannot change that. It takes a bit of determination, but it can be done.

There are no ‘victims’ here in Life. YOU make your life what you want it to be. YOU are totally responsible for every aspect of your life- whether or not you acknowledge that to be fact.

Privileged white? Is that a joke? People of color in America have all kinds of ‘bennies’ just because of the color of their skin. Higher education? No problem, honey- there’s a dozen funds to draw from IF you are a ‘person of color’. Can’t pass the tests? No problem- the schools lowered that standard back in the sixties. Heck, there’s even SPECIAL loans for people of color so they can purchase a home.

So stop whining and screaming, and go find out what is available, and get yourself into a home if that’s what you want. Of course, you’ll have to be earning something so as to make that monthly mortgage payment like all the other home owners…without assistance from the government.

Most people are living paycheck to paycheck and struggling having little if anything left over. The bills get paid, and there’s maybe a couple of dollars to get you through another week. Those home owners you are so clearly jealous of struggle every month to meet their bills. It’s no picnic, but it may be better than living in an apartment complex with that ‘subsidized reduced rent’ and food stamps and having to fill out endless paperwork to satisfy government agencies….

You better start realizing that no person, regardless of color, is going to give up their home to anyone after all the hard work it took them to get one. No one is going to give you what they worked for just because you have a different skin color.- regardless of whether or not they have any heir.

You best get a grip on our true history. The war between the states was NOT over ‘slavery’; it was because the there were certain persons who wanted to levy an extremely high tax on the southern states (who were in a better financial bracket; they were wealthier), so they could build a railroad that would only service the northern portion of the country. Had that railroad system been designed to equally serve their states, there would not have been such opposition.

At that time, the southern states grew the crops that fed our nation, as well as the crops that material was made from; the northern states, having a much shorter growing season, was where the factories were located that made the cloth and shoes for the nation.

Because of the heavy tax, the southern states wanted to leave the union. If they did so, all the other states that could not grow their own food in enough abundance, due to their short growing season, would obviously suffer. Those wanting the railroad, and those working in the factories, did not want the southern states to leave the union- it would be devastating for the northern states if that happened. The South, on the other hand, could easily support themselves, and they figured they could learn to make cloth and shoes, as well. The South could easily be self-reliant, whereas the northern states could not. Those wanting the railroad wanted to force the South into staying in the union- against the South’s wishes. Hence, the war.

The North did not have the financial resources of the South; they would have to get loans from foreign countries if they had to fight the South. Those who wanted the tax levied realized that no foreign country would assist them in forcing the southern states to stay in the union, especially when they found out how unfair the tax was, so they appealed to them for the loans by claiming they were trying to end slavery- which was not true.

They were not opposed to slavery at all; they realized that slavery was a valuable contribution to making the economy function. MANY, many countries world-wide utilized slavery -better known as indentured servants (people who traded their labor for their means of survival- housing, food, etc.).

If you knew history, you would know that slavery has always been an important part of national economic stability- all over the world. Someone has to do the work. Right now, China and many other countries have a ‘forced labor’ sector doing the work. If no one does the work, everyone suffers.

In America, people who work have to pay a tax on their wages. That tax pays the interest on the loans the government gets to pay for all the social service programs, as well as the many other things the country has to borrow money for in order to afford to provide for us all. You could even say that the common worker today is very much like the indentured servant of yesterday- they are having to support others, as well as themselves, on the labor they provide to an employer. 150 years ago, the same structure was happening, although the living conditions may not have been as good for some of them.

Most slave owners took very good care of their investments (their workers) because they knew that their workers labor directly affected the prosperity of the entire estate. Those owners that were abusive were not the norm- they were the exception.

There were many black slave owners. Proportionally, the number of slaves owned by black slave owners far exceeded those owned by white slave owners. White slave owners also tended to educate their workers, and teach them trades, whereas black slave owners tended to just use them as laborers. All of this is documented, although it has been removed from public school educational textbooks.

The reason for the removal of the true historic facts is a blatant attempt by those wishing to re-write history to serve their purpose of later fomenting division. It is one of the tools used to manipulate and control people.

So, perhaps, Ms. Helm, you need to actually go find out the facts before you act on your misconceptions about how ‘unfairly’ others have treated you. The only reason there is ‘generational poverty’ is because there is little to no effort by those ‘stuck’ in it to change it.

Bottom line: we are all in this together. It is up to each individual how they want to live, and that choice affects the whole nation.

If we value what we have, it is up to each of us to do our best to make sure we are self-reliant. Otherwise, those who want to destroy our nation will cause as much division as they can in order to do so.

That is why it is important- critical, actually – that people of all color stand united as a nation. There is no room for ‘division’ in a nation that chooses to stand strong. A united nation takes care of each individual by allowing each person the opportunity to contribute to the whole.

Those that prefer not to contribute in America have been offered programs to help sustain them, unlike many other countries. So perhaps it is not in one’s best interest to bite the hand that feeds one.

SOMEONE is paying for all the services offered to ‘low income families’- and that ‘someone’ is the American worker.

So please stop expecting more ‘freebies’. They are not free; they are being paid for by those who chose to work.

It would be really appreciated if a good portion of those receiving benefits, who have not previously contributed tax-wise, would go to work (either as a self-employed person, or as an employee) and would then contribute to the whole instead of just constantly- generationally- draining the coffers.

Do you actually think that these benefits would be available to the ‘generational poor’ once the country has been destroyed? Do you think your ‘masters’ will cover the costs of your survival when you chose not to contribute to their pocket?

Once America falls, and is no longer a free sovereign nation determining her own fate in the world, her people will become part of a One World Government, whose overlords will dictate over all. They will not be kind to those who chose not to contribute to their needs.

The only way to avoid this is to unite, as a people, and do everything one can to protect what we have. A free sovereign nation is a much better alternative than one that is enslaved and has no voice in the individual’s choices.

So put down your protest signs, and examine what is it that you are good at, and figure out a way to use those skills to make a living. There is available, at this time, the opportunity for anyone to learn new skills. And here, in America, anyone can take those skills and put them to good use making a living and helping others do the same. That is how to make a nation strong and improve the lives of many.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

then again, those planning this FEMA event may just be curious as to how many people become alerted to it, and then won’t do anything at all (until some later time). Maybe they are trying to find out how widespread the news gets about such an exercise… That way, it makes those who were alerted look like ‘loons’, so less people will pay attention thereafter…and be better able to be caught off guard later.
who know?

Looks like an exciting time:

"August 23 – A FEMA exercise known as “EarthEX2017” will simulate
“catastrophes such as mega earthquakes, cyber terrorism or high altitude
electromagnetic pulse attacks”…

    An exercise sponsored by FEMA and the U.S. Department of Energy set to
take place on August 23 called EarthEX2017 will wargame responses to
catastrophes such as mega earthquakes, cyber terrorism or high
altitude electromagnetic pulse attacks.

    The exercise will simulate a “subcontinent-scale, long duration power
outage, with cascading failures of all other infrastructures,”
according to the official Earth Ex website.

    “Black sky events” are defined as, “Catastrophic occurrences caused by
man or nature that bring society to its knees.”


You do realize if the kids are in school (or people at jobs, etc.)when
this occurs, there will be lock-down.

You may want to share this info with your friends, family and associates-
If people know they plan on doing this, they can better prepare, and thus
avoid the 'desired result' (ie. when people are in a state of fear, they
can be easily lead... it's called manipulation by any other name; create a
crisis and then pose as The Only Solution- it's 'controlling the masses'
at its finest).

Perhaps this info needs to go viral
(we can always spoil their party)

or you can ignore this.

There will be plenty who prefer to bury their heads in the sand and
continue to believe that those who run nations are looking out for our
best interests...
"be a good kid, take your drugs, and be submissive- we elites know what's
best for you"

But then again, God gave us brains to use them...and He gave us true power
which lies with the Individual. Every discovery and invention that has
helped mankind was done by an Individual (not a group).

something to think about

or perhaps act on...

(of course if we manage to stop this, they will try again later...)

No one could have said it better. The following article, from NoMoreFakeNews.com , was sent in today, and definitely worth reading:

“Historic: Trump rejects Paris climate treaty, June 1, 2017                               By Jon Rappoport June 1, 2017, a day that will live in infamy for the liar, thieves, and killers of the new international economic order. They will see it as infamy, because their plan to sink the economy of America into a final death rattle has been rejected by Trump.

Fake climate science has been the lynchpin, justifying orders to cut CO2 emissions—but make no mistake about it, cutting emissions means cutting energy production in almost all countries of the world. THAT’S THE GLOBALIST TARGET. ENERGY PRODUCTION.
Get that one straight. The Globalist “utopia” isn’t a trillion solar collectors or a trillion windmills—it’s lights going out all over the world.
It’s LOWER ENERGY PRODUCTION.
That’s the monster hiding in the closet. That’s the outcome arch-Globalists are determined to foist on the planet, because that’s the society they want to control—poverty-stricken, abject, shuffling along a bleak path to nowhere.
Trump just stuck a knife in that scheme.
Yes, I fully understand the devil is in the details, but it is up to people everywhere, who have active brain cells and can see through the climate hoax, to take this opportunity to reject, publicly, the whole climate agenda.
CO2 is not the enemy.
Do the research yourself and see if there is any way these so-called scientists can assess, now or in the past, THE TEMPERATURE OF THE WHOLE PLANET.
The science is settled? There is no room for argument?
Freeman Dyson, physicist and mathematician, professor emeritus at Princeton’s Institute for Advanced Study, Fellow of the Royal Society, winner of the Lorentz Medal, the Max Planck Medal, the Fermi Award: “What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies [in climate change models] between what’s observed and what’s predicted have become much stronger. It’s clear now the [climate change] models are wrong, but it wasn’t so clear 10 years ago… I’m 100 per cent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this [climate change] issue, and the Republicans took the right side…” (The Register, October 11, 2015)
Dr. Ivar Giaever, Nobel-prize winner in Physics (1973), reported by Climate Depot, July 8, 2015: “Global warming is a non-problem…I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you’re wrong. Dead wrong.”
Green Guru James Lovelock, who once predicted imminent destruction of the planet via global warming: “The computer models just weren’t reliable. In fact, I’m not sure the whole thing isn’t crazy, this climate change.” (The Guardian, September 30, 2016)
And these are but a tiny fraction of the statements made by dissident scientists who reject manmade global warming.
But regardless, never lose sight of agenda based on this “settled science.”
VASTLY LOWER ENERGY PRODUCTION FOR PLANET EARTH.
And at the same time, truly viable forms of energy production (e.g., water turbines, hydrogen), that could be brought online with but a fraction of previously chiseled government subsidies for oil and nuclear, are sitting on the shelf gathering dust—BECAUSE THE MODEL OF SCARCITY FOR THE PLANET IS WHAT THE GLOBALIST EMPIRE DESIRES.
Until such time as that model is destroyed, Earth needs energy, all the energy it can produce.
The climate criminals, working for Globalism Central, staged their Paris “Treaty” to try to torpedo that production. Obama signed on in Paris, knowing full well he was committing a criminally unconstitutional act by disregarding the vote of the US senate, a vote that was needed to confer legitimacy to the agreement.
There is nothing binding about the Paris “Treaty.” Nothing.
And today, Trump squashed it.
Might he re-enter negotiations and give away some of what he’s just taken back for America? Anything’s possible. But for now, the Paris Accord is a dead duck here in the US.
Trump is going to catch a new version of Hell for what he’s just done. But if enough Americans, and people around the world, realize the true implication of this historic day, and proclaim it, they’ll win. We’ll win. Each one of us.
Don’t give up. Don’t give in.”
___________________________________________________________
Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
Use this link to order Jon’s Matrix Collections.
To read this and other great articles of Jon’s, visit:
NoMoreFakeNews.com

Received this today:

AND SO IT BEGINS – THE FIX IS IN – MEULLER and COMEY

The Washington Post, a mouthpiece for Obama holdovers in the CIA and other agencies, reports that “sources” say a current White House official is under investigation as “a significant person of interest” in Russia-gate, but that the sources “would not further identify the official.”

     This is a case of anonymous officials talking about an anonymous official.

     Interestingly, the term “person of interest” was used by the FBI against scientist Steven Hatfill in the post-9/11anthrax letters case. He was totally innocent and the Department of Justice paid him $5.8 million in damages.

     The new Russia-gate special counsel, former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, presided over this fiasco

     After dismissing Hatfill and several others as suspects, the FBI blamed a dead U.S. Army scientist, Bruce Ivins. However, evidence indicates that the more likely culprits were al-Qaeda operatives who got the anthrax from a U.S. lab. The truth was too embarrassing for the FBI to reveal.

     The new Russia-gate special counsel, former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, presided over this fiasco. What’s more, Mueller was sued for malfeasance in the case by FBI agent Richard Lambert who was put in charge of the anthrax investigation.

     Yet, here is what we read about Mueller, who was FBI director under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama:

     “Widely respected by members of both parties” and “an unflinching advocate for facts,” claims The New York Times.

     “Skilled and upright,” writes Kimberley A. Strassel of The Wall Street Journal.

     “Widely respected” and “highly regarded by both parties,” writes Andrew McCarthy of National Review.

“    Uniquely suited to the task,” says The Washington Post.

     These comments reflect the consensus of what President Trump would call the “swamp.”

     A New York Times editorial was titled “Robert Mueller: The Special Counsel America Needs.” Making no mention of the anthrax debacle, it called Mueller “one of the few people with the experience, stature and reputation to see the job through.”

     Anthrax case: Comey and Mueller badly bungled the biggest case they ever handled

     A far different opinion is offered by Carl M. Cannon, executive editor and Washington Bureau chief of RealClearPolitics, who noted that the FBI director fired by Trump, James Comey, and Mueller “have a long history as professional allies. For Mueller to be brought in to investigate the behavior of the guy who sacked Comey seems a conflict of interest.”

     Cannon pointed to their work on the anthrax case, saying, “Comey and Mueller badly bungled the biggest case they ever handled. They botched the investigation of the 2001 anthrax letter attacks that took five lives and infected 17 other people…”

     Like Mueller, Comey, who was deputy attorney general, declared Hatfill guilty.

     Leaving aside Comey’s mishandling of another major investigation, the Hillary emails, consider his conduct and behavior.

     While President Trump has been attacked for calling Comey a “nut job” and “crazy,” Comey friend Benjamin Wittes says the former FBI director tried to hide in the curtains during a White House visit for a ceremony honoring law enforcement officials who provided security at the inauguration.

     The New York Times reported, “Mr. Comey—who is 6 feet 8 inches tall and was wearing a dark blue suit that day—told Mr. Wittes that he tried to blend in with the blue curtains in the back of the room, in the hopes that Mr. Trump would not spot him and call him out.”

     Reporters would rather write about the drapes than investigate the corruption under Comey and his predecessor, Mueller

     Was the 6 foot 8 inch Comey so crazy that he went to a White House event with Trump but tried to hide from him in the drapes?

     Wittes, in his own words, says that Comey “felt that he could not refuse a presidential invitation, particularly not one that went to a broad array of law enforcement leadership. So he went. But as he told me the story, he tried hard to blend into the background and avoid any one-on-one interaction. He was wearing a blue blazer and noticed that the drapes were blue. So he stood in the back, right in front of the drapes, hoping Trump wouldn’t notice him camouflaged against the wall. If you look at the video, Comey is standing about as far from Trump as it is physically possible to be in that room.”

     However, Comey was wearing a red tie that stood out like a sore thumb. His suit was darker than the drapes. Plus, Comey is so tall that he is hard to ignore, even with drapes behind him. Frankly this is nothing more than a diversion from the real issue—FBI corruption.

     Reporters would rather write about the drapes than investigate the corruption under Comey and his predecessor, Mueller.

     Who is Benjamin Wittes? He is the co-author of The Future of Violence: Robots and Germs, Hackers and Drones—Confronting A New Age of Threat. He discusses the anthrax attacks in the book.

     Five years after the FBI “closed” the case, Wittes doesn’t seem to accept the verdict that Bruce Ivins was the villain. He refers to Ivins as the FBI’s “suspect,” quickly adding, “or whoever else may have been responsible for the attacks.”

     So why didn’t Comey reopen the case? One possible explanation is that he didn’t want to upset Mueller and the FBI officials who engaged in the cover-up. He had approved their targeting of, and conclusions about, Hatfill.

     In return, Mueller, as special counsel in Russia-gate, can be expected to do Comey a big favor. He will not probe Comey’s malfeasance in using the phony “Trump Dossier” to investigate President Trump and his team. That is the real story—how Hillary donors financed by pro-Russian interests hired a former British agent to concoct an assortment of charges against Trump.

     Mueller is a company man; he will protect the FBI and its former director and friend. The fix is in.

     This is a far more important story than Comey hiding in the drapes. Writing about drapes may sound silly, but it is yet another way for the media to suggest that Comey was afraid of Trump trying to influence his inquiry into Russia-gate.

     The story is not how Trump influenced the investigation, but rather how Comey used the phony “Trump Dossier” to go down dead-end roads

     The story is not how Trump influenced the investigation, but rather how Comey used the phony “Trump Dossier” to go down dead-end roads and produce no results. It’s the anthrax investigation all over again.

     Mueller’s job is to pump life into Comey’s fiasco, and turn the tables on Trump for firing Comey.

     Meanwhile, corruption in the FBI goes unreported, and Congress fails to do adequate oversight of the intelligence community, which is supposed to keep us safe.

     Retired Foreign Service officer and intelligence analyst Kenneth J. Dillon told Accuracy in Media, “My research on the 2011 anthrax mailings case suggests that Mueller was responsible for the suicide of the alleged but wrongly accused mailer, Bruce Ivins, as well as for the subsequent cover-up. Mueller appears to have lied to a Senate committee about Ivins, and destroyed key alibi evidence for him. The new FBI director needs to reopen the anthrax mailings investigation and get to the bottom of this shocking and outrageous case.”

     Dillon’s research indicates that Ivins prepared the anthrax to test vaccines, but the anthrax was sent to various civilian labs, including one infiltrated by an al-Qaeda operative. The anthrax was transferred to another al-Qaeda operative, Abderraouf Jdey, and used in the attacks. “There was a very lax attitude in the pre-9/11 era relating to the handling of anthrax,” Dillon says.

     Why would this fact be suppressed? “The FBI was embarrassed by the fact that they had detained Jdey in August of 2001 and had let him go,” he says. Jdey was free, not only to mail the anthrax letters but according to Dillon’s theory, he went on to become the shoebomber on Flight 587, which crashed on November 12, 2001, and was conveniently blamed on co-pilot error.

     “If indeed Abderraouf Jdey brought down Flight 587 with a shoe bomb, the U.S. Government would have been deeply negligent in permitting an al Qaeda operative whose whereabouts were known to carry out this attack,” Dillon notes.

     Mueller has fooled a lot of people. His appointment is good news for the Swamp but bad news for Trump.

     Carl M. Cannon seems to think the outcome is preordained, noting the attitude of “official Washington” and what the “insiders” want to see happen—impeachment leading to Trump’s ouster.

     Unless Trump picks a new FBI director who will get to the bottom of the FBI’s corruption by shining the light on the mishandling of the anthrax probe, Trump may be hiding in the drapes before the Russia-gate investigation is over.

GREAT NEWS! Finally States are doing what needs to be done! This article, from another blogger (highly recommend reading his blog found at https://politicalcelcraft.org) who is most informative in his writings:

Arizona Governor Signs Bill Nullifying Capital Gains Taxes On Legal Tender Of Gold And Silver: Legalizing The United States Constitution

24 May 2017 by Volubrjotr

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2017/05/24/arizona-governor-signs-bill-nullifying-capital-gains-taxes-on-legal-tender-of-gold-and-silver-legalizing-the-united-states-constitution/

Legalizing The United States Constitution in Arizona.

On Monday, Gov. Doug Ducey signed a bill into law that eliminates states capital gains taxes on gold and silver specie. The tax repeal will not only benefit Arizonans who invest in gold and silver, it will also facilitate their use as currency and undermine the Federal Reserve’s monopoly on money.

Rep. Mark Finchem (R-Tucson) sponsored HB2014. The legislation eliminates state capital gains taxes on income “derived from the exchange of one kind of legal tender for another kind of legal tender.” The bill defines legal tender as “a medium of exchange, including specie, that is authorized by the United States Constitution or Congress for the payment of debts, public charges, taxes and dues.” “Specie” means coins having precious metal content.

In effect, passage into law will “legalize the Constitution” by treating gold and silver specie as money.

The new law will go into effect Aug. 9, 2017.

Getting Gov. Ducey’s signature on the bill was a major victory, and the culmination of more than five years of work by supporters of sound money in the Grand Canyon State. Similar legislation passed the legislature in 2013, 2015, and 2016, but Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed the first two bills, and Gov Doug Ducey killed last year’s effort.

Grassroots support was crucial in pushing this legislation across the finish line this year. A dedicated group of volunteers lobbied for the bill, and Ron Paul traveled to Arizona and testified on its behalf.

We ought not to tax money – and that’s a good idea. It makes no sense to tax money,” he said. “Paper is not money, it’s fraud.”

The new law’s impact goes beyond mere tax policy. During an event after his Senate committee testimony, Paul pointed out that it’s really about the size and scope of government.

If you’re for less government, you want sound money. The people who want big government, they don’t want sound money. They want to deceive you and commit fraud. They want to print the money. They want a monopoly. They want to get you conditioned, as our schools have conditioned us, to the point where deficits don’t matter.”

AN IMPORTANT STEP FORWARD

The new law allows taxpayers to deduct the amount of any net capital gain derived from the exchange of one kind of legal tender for another kind of legal tender or specie (gold and silver coins) from their gross income on their state income tax. In other words, individuals buying gold or silver bullion, or utilizing gold and silver in a transaction, would no longer be subject to state taxes on the exchange.

What the IRS has figured out at the federal level is to target inflation as a gain. They call it capital gains,” Finchem said during a committee hearing. He noted that the bill would help Arizona residents “protect their conversion of one kind of currency for another.”

Passage into law marks an important first step towards currency competition. If sound money gains a foothold in the marketplace against Federal Reserve notes, the people would be able to choose the time-tested stability of gold and silver over the central bank’s rapidly-depreciating paper currency. The freedom of choice expanded by HB2014 will help allow Arizona residents to secure the purchasing power of their money.

Ron Paul said he considered the Arizona bill to be “very important” because it would also serve as an educational effort for other states.

“The responsibility is on the states to follow the Constitution,” Paul said.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Currently, all debts and taxes in Arizona must be paid with either Federal Reserve Notes (dollars), authorized as legal tender by Congress, or with coins issued by the U.S. Treasury — very few of which have gold or silver in them.

But the United States Constitution states in Article I, Section 10, “No State shall…make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.”

The Arizona law takes a step towards that constitutional requirement, ignored for decades in every state. Such a tactic would undermine the monopoly or the Federal Reserve by introducing competition into the monetary system.

Professor William Greene is an expert on constitutional tender and said when people in multiple states actually start using gold and silver instead of Federal Reserve Notes, it would effectively nullify the Federal Reserve and end the federal government’s monopoly on money.

“Over time, as residents of the state use both Federal Reserve notes and silver and gold coins, the fact that the coins hold their value more than Federal Reserve notes do will lead to a “reverse Gresham’s Law” effect, where good money (gold and silver coins) will drive out bad money (Federal Reserve notes).

As this happens, a cascade of events can begin to occur, including the flow of real wealth toward the state’s treasury, an influx of banking business from outside of the state – as people in other states carry out their desire to bank with sound money – and an eventual outcry against the use of Federal Reserve notes for any transactions.”

Once things get to that point, Federal Reserve notes would become largely unwanted and irrelevant for ordinary people. Nullifying the Fed on a state by state level can get us there.

The Tenth Amendment Center contributed to this report.

Received this:

Hi,

You may want to pass this on to your readers. The UN is attempting to pass
laws that will affect every woman and her family. Their position:
"motherhood is demeaning"; all women need to be in the workforce (so they
can get control of our children, further brainwash them- "without the
negative influence of parents". It is really important that families/women
be aware of their agenda. They come across in a way that appears that they
are trying to help women "reach their potential without the burden of
children"...
I'm sure your readers and every other person you know may feel strongly
about this. Please pass it on, as there is a time limit, as well. See the
following link for more information. Thanks.
Laura

Join this petition! UN Representatives: #EmpowerMothers - Tell the UN that
motherhood is not a burden:
http://citizengo.org/en/fm/57355-empowermothers-tell-un-motherhood-not-burden?tc=gm

People need to be aware of this. Please read thoroughly:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm

http://rense.com/general32/americ.htm

http://www.conspiracyarchive.co/NWO/Global_Governance_1.htm

There’s also a lot of good articles on Political Vel Craft site pertaining

to all this Rothschild and manipulation going on. People are getting duped constantly w/ misrepresentation of the connections of the people who would have sovereignty destroyed. The more exposure this gets, the better people can make informed choices.

Many people have been manipulated into thinking & doing things that are seemingly ‘for the good of the whole’, a ‘group think’ mentality- it is a regular feature of public education.

Think ‘over population’, fact: less than 1% of the farmland in the US could feed the entire world population (*it takes 300 sq meters to feed one person for a year;that’s 358.8 sq. yards. There are 1484 sq. yds in 1 acre. The US farmland = 922,000,000 acres.

Additionally, if you put every person on earth, shoulder-to-shoulder, it would fill an area the size of L.A.; if you gave each of them .10 of an acre[enough for a home and some land], they would take up an area the size of Texas, Calif. & N.M. with room to spare.

Manipulation via public education so eugenics can be instituted- they believe that ‘some people'(not them, of course) take up too much room & too many resources- all a blatant lie. They want to rid the world of ‘poverty’ that they created by absconding w/ people’s land and resources, now blaming those people for the current state that those wishing control actually created.

They also would have us believe that reducing population would be the solution (they only need 500,000,000 to do their bidding, after all), so there has been many years of convincing us not have babies- ‘just replace yourselves if you are going to have children’,etc.-All the while they taint contraceptive devices, poison vaccines. Then, when one gets ‘ready’ to have a family, they find out they can’t reproduce;they have been sterilized and don’t know it. The families think there’s something ‘wrong’ w/ themselves, never realizing it was caused by the poisons these others subjected them to. Sterilization of people is going on everywhere, unbeknownst to the trusting public. Eugenics at it’s finest.

Please read all the links thoroughly- you will see that these people are not ‘humanitarian’, not acting in our interests ever.

There is a lot more to this debauchery. But those articles will show you a glimpse of how people have been manipulated, deceived to their detriment.

Also info on the whole psychiatric INDUSTRY that was created to catalog human behavior and support those who did that as well as support the drug industry. Are you aware that schools are now being PAID for every child they ‘determine’ has a ‘mental disorder’? Are you aware that these ‘disorders’ are ‘diagnosed’ from a book containing lists of human behaviors common to all humans? They put these lists in various orders, put a name to the set of behaviors, and viola! They have created 300+ ‘disorders’ thus far. These are all based on opinion; there is NO medical test of any kind thatcan definitively state there is a ‘mental disorder’. This multi-billion dollar industry harms millions of people. 8.4 million children on meds, some as young as 2 yrs, old.

Another very informative resource is John Taylor Gatto’s book, ‘The Underground History of American Education’ (which actually applies to most countries educational system today).

The way out is not only demand this gets address by those able to do so, but to educate the public on the matter. All progress throughout history has been made by promoting the individual (NOT the group),& individual creativeness, and by being self-reliant (that holds true for any family, community, or nation). If one isn’t beholden to anyone for their sustenance, they are free. If they can do what creative venture they are good at, using imagination freely, they are free. Everybody is good at something. Squashing individuality, and creativity allows suppression.Those that wish to control have suppressed humans for years by pushing an agenda that is detrimental to the individual & to imagination & self-reliance. Think of how far we could have progressed if that had not been happening!

ALL inventions that have been positive were done by creative INDIVIDUALS (not by any group)- it ALWAYS has been one person’s idea that triggered those inventions. When you learn the true history of what has been going on, you see how far they sucked people in, & how they did that. It is time to end the enslavement.

Please thoroughly read the links/books information & pass it along. It is time for human beings to take back their power. Then we’ll see progress in an advantageous direction for each person. We are the only ones who can break this detrimental stranglehold.

Many are getting really fed up with ‘news’ manipulation, and many are seeking news sources that are legitimate. People are really tired of having to decipher whether the news they get is fake or has some credibility. A few years ago, the following article appeared, and it has information that will have you reeling. All this time people have been supportive of Wikileaks, and even donated money, etc. to keep Wikileasks going. Perhaps it is time to plug the plug…

Read the following, found on:

http://theglobalelite.org/wikileaks-is-a-rothschild-operation/

Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation

on 22 December, 2012 at 12:17 am

wikileaks

Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law and Many Other Links.

After being made famous, Julian Assange’s first task is to wound a rival bank of the Rothschild Bank in Switzerland.  The rival is Bank Julius Baer, the top Swiss bank for centuries: the competing Rothschild Bank AG opened in Switzerland in 1968.

elmerassange

Wikileaks’ leader Julian Assange accepts a CD from Rudolph Elmer which reveals tax evation by wealthy clients of Swiss Bank Julius Baer, a rival of the Rothschild Bank in Switzerland.

On January 17, 2011, Assange held a press conference at The Frontline Club where Rudolf Elmer, a former employee of Bank Julius Baer, gave Assange private files from the bank’s Cayman Islands’ operation.  Elmer said he wanted to expose mass tax evasion before he flies back to Switzerland to stand trial for stealing information from a bank.  Although Elmer has not named the tax evaders, he claims the CD files contain information about 40 politicians, many business people, multinational conglomerates and “people who have made their living in the arts.”

Rothschilds’ Swiss Bank Battles: Assange’s press conference was actually a public threat to Bank Julius Baer:  Wikileaks first disclosed some of Elmer’s Julius-Baer material in 2008, naming ten clients.  At the time, Julius Baer sued and got a court injunction to effectively shut down Wikileaks.org at its web host in California.  Subsequently, the law firm Fox Rothschild represented Wikileaks, got the injunction overturned, and got Wikileaks.org back online.  Immediately, WL commenced leaking more of Elmer’s documents, which was damaging to Bank Julius Baer.

Bank JB got a lot of negative publicity from its attempt to censor the Internet.  When JB lost the suit, their super-elite clients became fearful of being exposed and prosecuted for tax evasion and money laundering.  Julius Baer shares dropped 60% during the next ten months.  On Dec. 4, 2008, the 52-year-old CEO of Julius Baer, Alex Widmer, was unexpectedly found dead.

“He was the most important person in private banking,” said a Zurich-based trader.

“This is a setback for the bank (Julius Baer),” a Swiss trading analyst said.

Reports of the cause of death were contradictory and vague and an autopsy was never released.

Wikileaks’ many other links to Rothschilds

assangeeconomist1

Wikileaks’ Julian Assange filming a video for The Economist (a Rothschild publication) which gave him its New Media Award.

The recent imprisonment of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange strains credulity.   His arrest by Interpol, his incarceration under draconian conditions for breaking a condom are in themselves highly unlikely events, but the timing of his imprisonment with the release of classified US cables and the campaign against Wikileaks’ funding and website host bear the trademarks of a covert operation.

The Puppetworld Post has uncovered many links between Wikileaks and the international Rothschild network:

–a sister-in-law and second cousin of the Rothschilds posted bail for Julian Assange (Puppetworld Post exclusive)

–The Economist (a Rothschild magazine) gave Assange its New Media Award in 2008

–Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn a judge’s ruling to order a web host to shut down the Wikileaks site

– The Guardian and The New York Times, two of Assange’s media partners, are linked to the Rothschilds (PwP exclusive)

–The owner of the mansion where Assange was eventually put under house arrest has links to Rothschilds

–Assange’s lawyer is also Rothschilds’ lawyer

–US Senator Joe Lieberman who was ultimately responsible for making Assange the largest media personality of the decade, is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations (a Rothschild organization)

[The Rothschilds are an international family of bankers at the centre of a web of wealthy families who control most the countries through a worldwide network of: privately-owned central banks (masquerading as federal banks), major news chains, trusts, councils, etcetera.   An unnamed source has put their monetary worth near $100 trillion—dwarfing the net worth of the likes of Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, etc.]

zacjemima

Zac Goldsmith (married to Kate Rothschild) winning the election with sister, Jemima Khan (nee Goldsmith) (right), and mother, Annabel Goldsmith.

Socialite, heiress Jemima Khan (nee Goldsmith) posted 20 000 pounds ($32 000) for the bail of Wikileaks’ leader Julian Assange.  She’s genetically related to the Rothschilds and she is a sister-in-law (Daily Mail Online, 10 May 2010).  Her father, the late James Goldsmith—British banker, publisher–is a cousin to the Rothschilds.  James’ grandfather Adolphe Goldschmidt  came to London as a multi-millionaire in 1895 and changed the family name from the German Goldschmidt to the English Goldsmith.   The Goldschmidts, like their neighbors and relatives the Rothschilds, had been prosperous merchant bankers in Frankfurt Germany since the 16th century (Wikipedia).

Following the Rothschild’s  centuries-old edict to interbreed,  Jemima Khan’s brother, Ben, wed Kate Rothschild in 2003 and recently her other brother, Zac, a new MP in British parliament had been having an affair with his brother’s sister-in-law, Alice Rothschild (Kate’s sister), up until he divorced his wife four days after he was elected MP.  Zac and Alice are presently living together.   Khan’s brothers are marrying into Rothschild wealth.

The Rothschilds began grooming Julian Assange in 2008, when Wikileaks was awarded The Economist’s New Media Award. The Economist is the voice of Britain’s establishment (led by the British Rothschilds) which has, for example, on balance, supported Britain’s involvement in the Iraq war.  Sir Evelyn Robert Adrian de Rothschild was chairman of The Economist from 1972 to 1989.  His wife Lynn Forester de Rothschild currently sits on The Economist’s board. The Rothschild family also has a large shareholder interest in The Economist.

At first blush, it is incredulous that the The Economist, the pinnacle of the establishment, would give their award to Assange knowing full well that he was releasing classified government documents and being overly aware of the havoc this will create in the world.  The Rothschilds’ oft- stated goal (over the centuries) is for a One World Government (i.e. The New World Order).  To this end they engineer conflict between nations, to create crises that will then be utilized to increase the power of international entities – the UN, World Bank, IMF, etc.  For example, they (and other closely-related families like the Schiffs) financed the Bolsheviks.  In the past, the Rothschild empire have profited by bankrolling both sides of war.

US senator Joe Lieberman is the Rothschild’s point man in America. During the last presidential election, he took his friend, Republican candidate John McCain to Jacob Rothschild’s house for a fund-raiser for McCain. Lieberman is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (a Rothschild cabal which is essentially the shadow government of the US).  Lieberman’s recent actions resulted in cutting off the money supply of Wikileaks:  Paypal, Mastercard, Visa, stopped accepting donations for Wikileaks.  Lieberman publicly took credit  for censoring Wikileaks’ website by pressuring Amazon to stop hosting the website. The result was that Anonymous hactivists launched attacks on the websites of companies (above) which had discontinued service to Wikileaks. Lieberman’s campaign against Wikileaks had the effect of increasing the martyrdom and hence the popularity of Assange and Wikileaks. Lieberman made Assange a star, nearly becoming Time magazine’s Man of The Year.
Julian Assange’s lawyer is Mark Stephens of Finers Stephens Innocent, a major London elite law firm. They are the legal adviser to the Rothschild’s prestigious Waddesdon Trust.

Assange’s main media partner is The Guardian. The Guardian has been infiltrated by  Rothschilds. The Guardian is controlled by Guardian Media Group whose chairman is Paul Myners a past employee of N. M. Rothschild Limited & Sons Limited.  Guardian Media Group is owned by Scott Trust which became a limited private company in 2008 with all trustees becoming directors of the Scott Trust. Anthony Salz was appointed as a trustee of Scott Trust in 2009:  He is currently executive vice-chairman of the investment Bank Rothschild.

The Guardian gave the US cables to the current New York Times. The chairman of the NYT is Arthur Sulzberger Jr., a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is the son of Arthur Ochs Sulzberger and grandson of Arthur Hays Sulzberger who served as a Trustee for the Rockefeller Foundation (in cahoots with Rothschilds for One World Government).

After a time in a real prison, Assange was “imprisoned” in a countryside mansion at the home of Vaughan Smith, the owner of Frontline Trust, a news organization that seeks to influence TV journalists. Frontline is funded by George Soros’ organization, Open Society Institute, and George Soros is intimately intertwined with the Rothschilds. George Soros has been a frequent business partner with James Goldsmith (father of Jemima Khan and cousin of the Rothschilds).  The director of Soros’ Open Society Institute, Richard Katz was director of N M Rothschild & Sons for 16 years. Other board members like Nils Taube also hold positions in Rothschild banks, etcetera. On October 25 and July 27 this year, Assange was a speaker at Vaughan Smith’s Frontline Trust.

Most people seem to believe that current events just happen, that events in the news are chain reactions of accidents, and that people with money and power sit idly by, watching events unfold.  However, The Rothschilds thrive on manipulating the markets by having insider information while propagating contrary misinformation.  In this way, they make huge profits.   Assange has already said that damaging information on one US bank will be released.  In this fragile recovery, the crisis could be pivotal.  The Guardian and the New York Times have this information so it is available to Rothschilds in order to “short” the bank before the information is released. Wikileaks is an invaluable tool for the Rothschilds to manipulate the financial markets, the whole monetary system, the future of nations, and the public.

The information (or misinformation) from Wikileaks also serves the Rothschild’s aim to increase conflict among nations in order to further their goal of One World Government.

 

The above article was copied verbatem and full credit is hereby given to the author(s) and webpage (http://theglobalelite.org/wikileaks-is-a-rothschild-operation/) in the hopes of letting many others know about this important article. There are many other informative articles to be found at:

http://theglobalelite.org

It is suggested that one visit their site and read the many articles available. Perhaps people can then make informed decisions regarding the ‘news’. Thanks are extended to the investigation and exposure that the above cited site has done, and may they continue doing so.

%d bloggers like this: