A bit late on the Merry Christmas, however, one will have that when one cannot get logged in to their blog… But do hope everyone had a great Christmas, and hope you all have a happy, healthy, and prosperous New Year!


Received this recently:

“Hey all you PLAYERS who are being paid MILLIONS – Yeah, YOU! What is stopping you from opening a center where people can learn a trade so they can make a decent living? Or do you actually believe that ranting around, burning our national flag, or refusing to stand for our national anthem is the most effective way to draw attention to a self-inflicted issue?

Don’t think the ‘poor’ Black has a self-inflicted Issue? Dealing drugs and going into other peoples’ businesses and homes, stealing things, and then selling them- acting like ya’ll above the law- and havin’ an attitude about it all- being a punk-ass whiner instead of applying yourself to something positive…and then ya’ll wonder why ya get your ass beat when shtf? Seriously?

Got news for ya- ya don’t HAVE to live in the projects- you don’t HAVE to take some piss-ant low-pay job (which most don’t even try to do anyway)- you don’t HAVE to do what all yo bros do to make ends meet. Heck, ya could go BE a cop, and see how patient ya’ll would be when confronted with twits doin’ stupid shit (and yeah, there’s bad cops, but also good ones, too).

Or you could grow a backbone, go learn a trade or other line of work that pays well- and learn to do it really well, so you can get paid top dollar. That may require you sacrificing “livin’ in the hood” for a bit, because the money and good-paying opportunities are generally not floatin’ ’round the Hood. Yeah- it means you will have to go somewhere else. Yeah, that requires you movin’ outta yo ‘comfort zone’.

Why don’t ya ask some of yo bros that are kickin’ it Big Time if they’d move BACK to the Hood? They’d probably find that question pretty funny.

No, they livin’ in their Big Houses, with their Fancy Cars, and they got themselves Big Name Lawyers and Fat Payin’ Contracts….not too likely THEY’D be willin’ to move Back to the Hood- if they even CAME from the Hood. Most of them boys’ parents had already busted out of the hood years ago- living in Suburbia with a decent job and all; makin’ sure their kid stayed in school and was supportive of him bein’ in sports and all.

And, now, here’s their spoiled rotten kid, PLAYING for a living- running under a National Banner, being sponsored by big payin’ companies who get their pay from Joe Citizen who likes to watch a GAME… screamin’ and rantin’ and kneelin’ and generally being totally disrespectful – biting the hand that feeds him- for a ’cause’, an issue brought on by actions that generally could have been avoided.

If these Big-Time PLAYERS really want to help their bros, they could be founding centers where people have the opportunity to learn a trade or other line of work that will offer better opportunity for them than bein’ on the street getting into trouble. Maybe ya’ll can encourage them to do something positive with all their millions of dollars – offer scholarships, build learning centers, etc. –

‘Cause right now, they lookin’ the Fool. That’s right. They got millions of dollars, and they doin’ nothin’ for you wid it. They blamin’ America, or cops, or ‘Whitey’ instead of realizin’ it’s an individual’s problem. It’s the individual who makes the choices in their own life.

In order to make changes in yo life, you gots to stop makin’ excuses. You got to just do what’s right. You ain’t no victim;yo ain’t no slave. You got choices. Every day. Stop playin’ the fool and make choices that gonna get you where you want to be in life. Plain an’ simple.

And you Big-Time Players…go DO something with all that money to change the situation. You got no excuse for your disrespectful behavior. Don’t like what’s goin’ on? Change it. Or leave the country. See how well you do elsewhere. ‘Cause you actin’ all ignorant and simple-minded. Shame on you! How yo gonna change things actin’ all stupid?

What yo gonna be? A Stumbling Block or a Stepping Stone?”

There are some today that are attempting to change the way we vote. Before we are hood-winked into allowing something detrimental to happen, it is critical that we fully understand why our voting system is set up the way it is.
In order to make informed decisions, we must first examine the facts and understand what is at stake.
The following is an article just published by JBS.org :
Save Your Freedom From a Tyranny of the Majority:
No National Popular Vote!
Democracies Lead to a Tyranny of the Majority
The Founding Fathers gave us a constitutional Republic, not a Democracy, in order to prevent the loss of our rights and freedoms to a tyranny of the majority. The Electoral College is one of the key aspects of the Constitution for accomplishing this purpose.

What Is the Electoral College?


Click on the above video or link to get a quick understanding of what the Electoral College is and how it protects our rights and freedoms from a tyranny of the majority.

Basically, the Electoral College provides an indirect method (Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution) for the election of the president and vice-president. Although voters in each state think they are voting directly for the president and vice-president of their choice every four years, they are actually voting directly for electors that are pledged to vote for the various presidential and vice-presidential candidates on the ballot.

Since the number of electors alloted for each state is based on the number of congressional districts for that state plus two (based on the two senators in each state), California (based on its very large population), has 55 electors and Wyoming (based on its very small population), has only 3 electors. The total number of electors is 538, and the number needed for a presidential candidate to win is 270 (a majority).

Benefits of the Electoral College
Although there are many arguments for either keeping the Electoral College or replacing it with a national popular vote, we’ll only consider a few of the important ones for keeping the Electoral College.

First, keeping the Electoral College affirms the important role of the states in our constitutional Republic (as enshrined in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution), which is often referred to as federalism. Discarding the Electoral College in favor of a national popular vote would be a big step toward converting our Republic into a Democracy. As explained below, states that adopt the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) legislation agree to allot all of their electoral votes to the presidential candidate that wins the national popular vote. That means that if your state adopts the NPVIC legislation, then your state’s Electoral College votes will be alloted to the winner of the national popular vote for president, even if the majority of voters in your state vote for a different candidate.

Second, the number of votes each state is allotted in the Electoral College provides an upper limit on the influence on presidential elections exerted by large population states. For example, with the Electoral College, California’s influence on elections compared to Wyoming’s influence is capped by the ratio of 55 (electoral votes) to 3 (electoral votes). No matter how many more millions of votes are received by the winning candidate as compared to the losing candidate in California, that candidate would still only get 55 votes in the Electoral College, and Wyoming would still get its 3 votes. This feature of the Electoral College helps prevent the tyranny of the majority problem associated with democracies.

Third, with the Electoral College widespread voter fraud in a large population state like California, a safe, blue state, would very rarely change the outcome of a presidential election because under the “winner take all” rules of nearly all states, if the winner gets only one vote more statewide than the opponent, the winner gets (in the example of California) 55 electoral votes. If the winner would receive millions more votes through voter fraud instead, he or she would still get only 55 electoral votes. The same would be true for large population red states. Therefore, the Electoral College serves to prevent voter fraud from changing who wins presidential elections.

The National Popular Vote Movement to Replace the Electoral College
Now, over two centuries after the Electoral College went into effect, there is a highly funded movement, the National Popular Vote movement (NPV), to replace this key component of our constitutional Republic.

The NPV movement is a clever way to convert our presidential elections from being determined by the Electoral College to being determined by the national popular vote without the necessity of a constitutional amendment. This “workaround” is based on the power of each state, as provided in Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, to appoint its electors “in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct.” However, since about half of the states would be subject to this completely new procedure for electing the president without giving their consent, a constitutional amendment would appear to be required. In fact, once the NPV Interstate Compact would reach 270 electoral votes, then theoretically, the remaining states would become forever irrelevant in presidential elections. In practice, they would probably join the compact just to avoid this presidential election limbo. But that’s no way to change such an important part of our constitutional system of government.

In 2006 the NPV movement began introducing NPVIC (National Popular Vote Interstate Compact) legislation in various state legislatures. This legislation was designed so that each state that joined the interstate compact agreed to award all of its electoral votes in presidential elections to the candidate that wins the popular vote in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. However, this assignment of electoral votes based on the winner of the national popular vote will not go into effect until the states joining this compact have a combined total of 270 or more electoral votes.

NPVIC Status
As of September 2017, the NPVIC legislation has been adopted by ten states and the District of Columbia with a total of 165 electoral votes. This amounts to 61% of the 270 votes needed to legally activate the NPV interstate compact. The states which have passed the NPVIC legislation are Maryland (2007), New Jersey (2008), Illinois (2008), Hawaii (2008), Washington (2009), Massachusetts (2010), the District of Columbia (2010), Vermont (2011), California (2011), Rhode Island (2013), and New York (2014).

What’s Next for the NPV Movement?
Thanks to “Is the Electoral College Doomed?” published in the September/October POLITICO Magazine (yes, we have to be wary of this source), we have some insights into the current strategy of the NPV promoters. Tim Alberta, the author of this article, was one of 11 political journalists who were flown to Panama in mid-February on a “booze-soaked junket” to partake in an “educational seminar” on election reform by NPVIC backers. Many state legislators had already been treated to this type of seminar. Then, beginning last fall, the NPVIC backers began including journalists and opinion leaders in these seminars.

In short, Alberta learned that the NPV promoters have a problem. All of the states that have adopted the NPVIC legislation are blue states. They need to start getting some red states to sign on to be successful. However, now that Trump has won the presidency by virtue of his majority in the Electoral College, but without winning the national popular vote, why would Republican-led state legislatures want to sign on to the NPVIC? If the NPVIC had been in effect in 2016, Clinton would be the president now. Hence, the NPV movement has a big problem in the red states.

So, Alberta learned that the NPV strategy for 2018 is “is to kick off the year by targeting not just any Republican states but Utah and Oklahoma – two of the most conservative in the union – in pursuit of a symbolic breakthrough.” The NPV leadership believes that if they get these two states, they’ll end up getting four or five more red states.

What to Do?
If you’re in Utah or Oklahoma, or any other red state that will be in session in 2018, begin visiting, phoning, and emailing your state legislators now in opposition to adopting the NPVIC legislation. Don’t be overconfident that the NPVIC legislation will never pass in your red state. Surprisingly, the Oklahoma Senate approved an NPVIC bill in 2014 and the Arizona House did so in 2016.  If your state legislators are Republican, your first point should be to ask why would they support the NPV legislation since it would serve to almost guarantee that Democrats would win the presidency in the foreseeable future. A second point is that adopting the NPVIC would serve to dramatically reduce the role of states in presidential elections. Not only would the NPVIC deliver your state’s electoral votes to the national popular vote winner even if the majority of voters in your state voted for a different candidate, but a very large number of states (likely a majority) would have the whole presidential election process, known as the Electoral College (as provided in Article II of the Constitution), transformed without their consent and without their participation in a constitutional amendment process. A third point would be how the Electoral College caps the influence of the large population states and therefore helps prevent the tyranny of the majority problem. A fourth point would be to mention how the Electoral College helps prevent voter fraud from changing who wins presidential elections.

If you’re in Utah or Oklahoma, or any other red state, and you’re talking to a Democratic state legislator, you should of course, forget about making the first point mentioned in the previous paragraph and go on to make points 2-4.

If you’re in a blue state that still hasn’t adopted the NPVIC legislation and that will be in session in 2018, please contact your state legislators in opposition to the NPVIC legislation. Make the points detailed in the previous two paragraphs.

If you’re in a state that has already passed the NPVIC legislation, you should work with your state legislators to get a bill introduced to repeal the NPVIC legislation for the reasons discussed in the immediately preceding paragraphs. So far, such repeal bills have been introduced in Maryland, New Jersey, and Washington, but have failed.

Action Summary
Visit and phone your state legislators in opposition to the replacement of the Electoral College with the national popular vote for presidential elections. See the “What to Do?” section above for talking points. Click here to look up office addresses and phone numbers.

Click here to email your state legislators in opposition to the national popular vote for presidential elections using the prewritten, editable message provided.


It is absolutely incredible what some will attempt to do.

Currently, there are many who are being funded by the likes of George Soros and his multitude of falsely labeled ‘humanitarian’ organizations to cause as much division and unrest as possible. After all, a country divided is much easier to bring down than one who stands strongly united.

Yet these protesters- many of whom are paid to protest- do not see that they are being used. They never consider that ultimately, after their ‘purpose’ has been served, they will be discarded and come to the same ugly fate, by the very people paying them to protest today, as the rest of the populace that they are protesting against.

They do not consider that all this activity is deliberately designed to eventually work against them, as well as those they are targeting.

They never consider that the statutes they want to destroy are a testament to all of our history. Our history, together, as a nation of diverse peoples, belongs to all of our people. Once the history has been removed, those who are paying for the destruction, via protests, will re-write that history to ‘read’ whatever they choose it to be. That is dangerous because it causes people to disconnect from their ancestors, their past and our true history.

These same protestors are obviously unaware that America’s history is a history that actually had MORE white slaves than we ever had black ones.  They also are unaware that Robert E. Lee was a Democrat. They are disrespecting our history- a history we all share, be that good, bad, or indifferent. They do not have the right to destroy what belongs to all of us, yet that is what they are doing- taking our history away from all of us.

They will not stop there. No, there are those among these protestors that think someone (white) owes them- simply because of the color of their skin. Who, then, owes all the descendants of the white slaves, pray tell?

Now, we read in the Louisville Eccentric Observer, of one person, named Chennelle Helm, a self-proclaimed Black Lives Matter Louisville organizer, who is now demanding that white people give up their houses to black or brown people. She is stating that whites re-budget their finances so they can financially support black and/or brown people. She wants whites to will their inheritance to black or brown people, and promotes publicly harassing anyone who may be suspect as a racist.

Among other things. Seriously.

Perhaps  if she was willing to put half the energy into getting herself into a responsible financial position, rather than screaming for free handouts from those willing to work hard, she may feel entirely different about the matter. After all, doing so may enable her to purchase her own home, like so many – of all various colors – have done.

If one could directly speak to Ms. Helm, they may state something like:

Honey, NO ONE is going to save you- YOU have to save yourself. NO ONE OWES YOU ANYTHING. If you want something, you have to put in the time and effort to earn it.

Those are the lessons many home owners learned. And because they knew they were responsible for how they ultimately lived, they willingly put in the time and effort. Very few were ever ‘handed’ their home or their means of living. Most worked for it, and did what it took. They may not have even liked their jobs, but they stuck to it, and did what was required in order to secure the financing necessary to purchase their home.

And those who purchase homes pay their mortgage (‘rent’ owed to the bank) every month- on time- without the government doing it for them. They do not get assistance; they have to earn that money themselves (in addition to being taxed on their wages which enables the government to pay the assistance programs, like welfare, rent subsidy, food stamps and medicaid, to those who don’t chose to do the same). And then in 30 years or so, they FINALLY get the papers from the bank that says they NOW own that home. Sadly, darlin’, there is NO such thing as a ‘free lunch’. Even welfare recipients pay a price for that hand-out.

Just because you are among the ‘generational poor’ doesn’t mean YOU cannot change that. It takes a bit of determination, but it can be done.

There are no ‘victims’ here in Life. YOU make your life what you want it to be. YOU are totally responsible for every aspect of your life- whether or not you acknowledge that to be fact.

Privileged white? Is that a joke? People of color in America have all kinds of ‘bennies’ just because of the color of their skin. Higher education? No problem, honey- there’s a dozen funds to draw from IF you are a ‘person of color’. Can’t pass the tests? No problem- the schools lowered that standard back in the sixties. Heck, there’s even SPECIAL loans for people of color so they can purchase a home.

So stop whining and screaming, and go find out what is available, and get yourself into a home if that’s what you want. Of course, you’ll have to be earning something so as to make that monthly mortgage payment like all the other home owners…without assistance from the government.

Most people are living paycheck to paycheck and struggling having little if anything left over. The bills get paid, and there’s maybe a couple of dollars to get you through another week. Those home owners you are so clearly jealous of struggle every month to meet their bills. It’s no picnic, but it may be better than living in an apartment complex with that ‘subsidized reduced rent’ and food stamps and having to fill out endless paperwork to satisfy government agencies….

You better start realizing that no person, regardless of color, is going to give up their home to anyone after all the hard work it took them to get one. No one is going to give you what they worked for just because you have a different skin color.- regardless of whether or not they have any heir.

You best get a grip on our true history. The war between the states was NOT over ‘slavery’; it was because the there were certain persons who wanted to levy an extremely high tax on the southern states (who were in a better financial bracket; they were wealthier), so they could build a railroad that would only service the northern portion of the country. Had that railroad system been designed to equally serve their states, there would not have been such opposition.

At that time, the southern states grew the crops that fed our nation, as well as the crops that material was made from; the northern states, having a much shorter growing season, was where the factories were located that made the cloth and shoes for the nation.

Because of the heavy tax, the southern states wanted to leave the union. If they did so, all the other states that could not grow their own food in enough abundance, due to their short growing season, would obviously suffer. Those wanting the railroad, and those working in the factories, did not want the southern states to leave the union- it would be devastating for the northern states if that happened. The South, on the other hand, could easily support themselves, and they figured they could learn to make cloth and shoes, as well. The South could easily be self-reliant, whereas the northern states could not. Those wanting the railroad wanted to force the South into staying in the union- against the South’s wishes. Hence, the war.

The North did not have the financial resources of the South; they would have to get loans from foreign countries if they had to fight the South. Those who wanted the tax levied realized that no foreign country would assist them in forcing the southern states to stay in the union, especially when they found out how unfair the tax was, so they appealed to them for the loans by claiming they were trying to end slavery- which was not true.

They were not opposed to slavery at all; they realized that slavery was a valuable contribution to making the economy function. MANY, many countries world-wide utilized slavery -better known as indentured servants (people who traded their labor for their means of survival- housing, food, etc.).

If you knew history, you would know that slavery has always been an important part of national economic stability- all over the world. Someone has to do the work. Right now, China and many other countries have a ‘forced labor’ sector doing the work. If no one does the work, everyone suffers.

In America, people who work have to pay a tax on their wages. That tax pays the interest on the loans the government gets to pay for all the social service programs, as well as the many other things the country has to borrow money for in order to afford to provide for us all. You could even say that the common worker today is very much like the indentured servant of yesterday- they are having to support others, as well as themselves, on the labor they provide to an employer. 150 years ago, the same structure was happening, although the living conditions may not have been as good for some of them.

Most slave owners took very good care of their investments (their workers) because they knew that their workers labor directly affected the prosperity of the entire estate. Those owners that were abusive were not the norm- they were the exception.

There were many black slave owners. Proportionally, the number of slaves owned by black slave owners far exceeded those owned by white slave owners. White slave owners also tended to educate their workers, and teach them trades, whereas black slave owners tended to just use them as laborers. All of this is documented, although it has been removed from public school educational textbooks.

The reason for the removal of the true historic facts is a blatant attempt by those wishing to re-write history to serve their purpose of later fomenting division. It is one of the tools used to manipulate and control people.

So, perhaps, Ms. Helm, you need to actually go find out the facts before you act on your misconceptions about how ‘unfairly’ others have treated you. The only reason there is ‘generational poverty’ is because there is little to no effort by those ‘stuck’ in it to change it.

Bottom line: we are all in this together. It is up to each individual how they want to live, and that choice affects the whole nation.

If we value what we have, it is up to each of us to do our best to make sure we are self-reliant. Otherwise, those who want to destroy our nation will cause as much division as they can in order to do so.

That is why it is important- critical, actually – that people of all color stand united as a nation. There is no room for ‘division’ in a nation that chooses to stand strong. A united nation takes care of each individual by allowing each person the opportunity to contribute to the whole.

Those that prefer not to contribute in America have been offered programs to help sustain them, unlike many other countries. So perhaps it is not in one’s best interest to bite the hand that feeds one.

SOMEONE is paying for all the services offered to ‘low income families’- and that ‘someone’ is the American worker.

So please stop expecting more ‘freebies’. They are not free; they are being paid for by those who chose to work.

It would be really appreciated if a good portion of those receiving benefits, who have not previously contributed tax-wise, would go to work (either as a self-employed person, or as an employee) and would then contribute to the whole instead of just constantly- generationally- draining the coffers.

Do you actually think that these benefits would be available to the ‘generational poor’ once the country has been destroyed? Do you think your ‘masters’ will cover the costs of your survival when you chose not to contribute to their pocket?

Once America falls, and is no longer a free sovereign nation determining her own fate in the world, her people will become part of a One World Government, whose overlords will dictate over all. They will not be kind to those who chose not to contribute to their needs.

The only way to avoid this is to unite, as a people, and do everything one can to protect what we have. A free sovereign nation is a much better alternative than one that is enslaved and has no voice in the individual’s choices.

So put down your protest signs, and examine what is it that you are good at, and figure out a way to use those skills to make a living. There is available, at this time, the opportunity for anyone to learn new skills. And here, in America, anyone can take those skills and put them to good use making a living and helping others do the same. That is how to make a nation strong and improve the lives of many.





then again, those planning this FEMA event may just be curious as to how many people become alerted to it, and then won’t do anything at all (until some later time). Maybe they are trying to find out how widespread the news gets about such an exercise… That way, it makes those who were alerted look like ‘loons’, so less people will pay attention thereafter…and be better able to be caught off guard later.
who know?

Looks like an exciting time:

"August 23 – A FEMA exercise known as “EarthEX2017” will simulate
“catastrophes such as mega earthquakes, cyber terrorism or high altitude
electromagnetic pulse attacks”…

    An exercise sponsored by FEMA and the U.S. Department of Energy set to
take place on August 23 called EarthEX2017 will wargame responses to
catastrophes such as mega earthquakes, cyber terrorism or high
altitude electromagnetic pulse attacks.

    The exercise will simulate a “subcontinent-scale, long duration power
outage, with cascading failures of all other infrastructures,”
according to the official Earth Ex website.

    “Black sky events” are defined as, “Catastrophic occurrences caused by
man or nature that bring society to its knees.”

You do realize if the kids are in school (or people at jobs, etc.)when
this occurs, there will be lock-down.

You may want to share this info with your friends, family and associates-
If people know they plan on doing this, they can better prepare, and thus
avoid the 'desired result' (ie. when people are in a state of fear, they
can be easily lead... it's called manipulation by any other name; create a
crisis and then pose as The Only Solution- it's 'controlling the masses'
at its finest).

Perhaps this info needs to go viral
(we can always spoil their party)

or you can ignore this.

There will be plenty who prefer to bury their heads in the sand and
continue to believe that those who run nations are looking out for our
best interests...
"be a good kid, take your drugs, and be submissive- we elites know what's
best for you"

But then again, God gave us brains to use them...and He gave us true power
which lies with the Individual. Every discovery and invention that has
helped mankind was done by an Individual (not a group).

something to think about

or perhaps act on...

(of course if we manage to stop this, they will try again later...)

No one could have said it better. The following article, from NoMoreFakeNews.com , was sent in today, and definitely worth reading:

“Historic: Trump rejects Paris climate treaty, June 1, 2017                               By Jon Rappoport June 1, 2017, a day that will live in infamy for the liar, thieves, and killers of the new international economic order. They will see it as infamy, because their plan to sink the economy of America into a final death rattle has been rejected by Trump.

Fake climate science has been the lynchpin, justifying orders to cut CO2 emissions—but make no mistake about it, cutting emissions means cutting energy production in almost all countries of the world. THAT’S THE GLOBALIST TARGET. ENERGY PRODUCTION.
Get that one straight. The Globalist “utopia” isn’t a trillion solar collectors or a trillion windmills—it’s lights going out all over the world.
That’s the monster hiding in the closet. That’s the outcome arch-Globalists are determined to foist on the planet, because that’s the society they want to control—poverty-stricken, abject, shuffling along a bleak path to nowhere.
Trump just stuck a knife in that scheme.
Yes, I fully understand the devil is in the details, but it is up to people everywhere, who have active brain cells and can see through the climate hoax, to take this opportunity to reject, publicly, the whole climate agenda.
CO2 is not the enemy.
Do the research yourself and see if there is any way these so-called scientists can assess, now or in the past, THE TEMPERATURE OF THE WHOLE PLANET.
The science is settled? There is no room for argument?
Freeman Dyson, physicist and mathematician, professor emeritus at Princeton’s Institute for Advanced Study, Fellow of the Royal Society, winner of the Lorentz Medal, the Max Planck Medal, the Fermi Award: “What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies [in climate change models] between what’s observed and what’s predicted have become much stronger. It’s clear now the [climate change] models are wrong, but it wasn’t so clear 10 years ago… I’m 100 per cent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this [climate change] issue, and the Republicans took the right side…” (The Register, October 11, 2015)
Dr. Ivar Giaever, Nobel-prize winner in Physics (1973), reported by Climate Depot, July 8, 2015: “Global warming is a non-problem…I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you’re wrong. Dead wrong.”
Green Guru James Lovelock, who once predicted imminent destruction of the planet via global warming: “The computer models just weren’t reliable. In fact, I’m not sure the whole thing isn’t crazy, this climate change.” (The Guardian, September 30, 2016)
And these are but a tiny fraction of the statements made by dissident scientists who reject manmade global warming.
But regardless, never lose sight of agenda based on this “settled science.”
And at the same time, truly viable forms of energy production (e.g., water turbines, hydrogen), that could be brought online with but a fraction of previously chiseled government subsidies for oil and nuclear, are sitting on the shelf gathering dust—BECAUSE THE MODEL OF SCARCITY FOR THE PLANET IS WHAT THE GLOBALIST EMPIRE DESIRES.
Until such time as that model is destroyed, Earth needs energy, all the energy it can produce.
The climate criminals, working for Globalism Central, staged their Paris “Treaty” to try to torpedo that production. Obama signed on in Paris, knowing full well he was committing a criminally unconstitutional act by disregarding the vote of the US senate, a vote that was needed to confer legitimacy to the agreement.
There is nothing binding about the Paris “Treaty.” Nothing.
And today, Trump squashed it.
Might he re-enter negotiations and give away some of what he’s just taken back for America? Anything’s possible. But for now, the Paris Accord is a dead duck here in the US.
Trump is going to catch a new version of Hell for what he’s just done. But if enough Americans, and people around the world, realize the true implication of this historic day, and proclaim it, they’ll win. We’ll win. Each one of us.
Don’t give up. Don’t give in.”
Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
Use this link to order Jon’s Matrix Collections.
To read this and other great articles of Jon’s, visit:

Received this today:


The Washington Post, a mouthpiece for Obama holdovers in the CIA and other agencies, reports that “sources” say a current White House official is under investigation as “a significant person of interest” in Russia-gate, but that the sources “would not further identify the official.”

     This is a case of anonymous officials talking about an anonymous official.

     Interestingly, the term “person of interest” was used by the FBI against scientist Steven Hatfill in the post-9/11anthrax letters case. He was totally innocent and the Department of Justice paid him $5.8 million in damages.

     The new Russia-gate special counsel, former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, presided over this fiasco

     After dismissing Hatfill and several others as suspects, the FBI blamed a dead U.S. Army scientist, Bruce Ivins. However, evidence indicates that the more likely culprits were al-Qaeda operatives who got the anthrax from a U.S. lab. The truth was too embarrassing for the FBI to reveal.

     The new Russia-gate special counsel, former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, presided over this fiasco. What’s more, Mueller was sued for malfeasance in the case by FBI agent Richard Lambert who was put in charge of the anthrax investigation.

     Yet, here is what we read about Mueller, who was FBI director under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama:

     “Widely respected by members of both parties” and “an unflinching advocate for facts,” claims The New York Times.

     “Skilled and upright,” writes Kimberley A. Strassel of The Wall Street Journal.

     “Widely respected” and “highly regarded by both parties,” writes Andrew McCarthy of National Review.

“    Uniquely suited to the task,” says The Washington Post.

     These comments reflect the consensus of what President Trump would call the “swamp.”

     A New York Times editorial was titled “Robert Mueller: The Special Counsel America Needs.” Making no mention of the anthrax debacle, it called Mueller “one of the few people with the experience, stature and reputation to see the job through.”

     Anthrax case: Comey and Mueller badly bungled the biggest case they ever handled

     A far different opinion is offered by Carl M. Cannon, executive editor and Washington Bureau chief of RealClearPolitics, who noted that the FBI director fired by Trump, James Comey, and Mueller “have a long history as professional allies. For Mueller to be brought in to investigate the behavior of the guy who sacked Comey seems a conflict of interest.”

     Cannon pointed to their work on the anthrax case, saying, “Comey and Mueller badly bungled the biggest case they ever handled. They botched the investigation of the 2001 anthrax letter attacks that took five lives and infected 17 other people…”

     Like Mueller, Comey, who was deputy attorney general, declared Hatfill guilty.

     Leaving aside Comey’s mishandling of another major investigation, the Hillary emails, consider his conduct and behavior.

     While President Trump has been attacked for calling Comey a “nut job” and “crazy,” Comey friend Benjamin Wittes says the former FBI director tried to hide in the curtains during a White House visit for a ceremony honoring law enforcement officials who provided security at the inauguration.

     The New York Times reported, “Mr. Comey—who is 6 feet 8 inches tall and was wearing a dark blue suit that day—told Mr. Wittes that he tried to blend in with the blue curtains in the back of the room, in the hopes that Mr. Trump would not spot him and call him out.”

     Reporters would rather write about the drapes than investigate the corruption under Comey and his predecessor, Mueller

     Was the 6 foot 8 inch Comey so crazy that he went to a White House event with Trump but tried to hide from him in the drapes?

     Wittes, in his own words, says that Comey “felt that he could not refuse a presidential invitation, particularly not one that went to a broad array of law enforcement leadership. So he went. But as he told me the story, he tried hard to blend into the background and avoid any one-on-one interaction. He was wearing a blue blazer and noticed that the drapes were blue. So he stood in the back, right in front of the drapes, hoping Trump wouldn’t notice him camouflaged against the wall. If you look at the video, Comey is standing about as far from Trump as it is physically possible to be in that room.”

     However, Comey was wearing a red tie that stood out like a sore thumb. His suit was darker than the drapes. Plus, Comey is so tall that he is hard to ignore, even with drapes behind him. Frankly this is nothing more than a diversion from the real issue—FBI corruption.

     Reporters would rather write about the drapes than investigate the corruption under Comey and his predecessor, Mueller.

     Who is Benjamin Wittes? He is the co-author of The Future of Violence: Robots and Germs, Hackers and Drones—Confronting A New Age of Threat. He discusses the anthrax attacks in the book.

     Five years after the FBI “closed” the case, Wittes doesn’t seem to accept the verdict that Bruce Ivins was the villain. He refers to Ivins as the FBI’s “suspect,” quickly adding, “or whoever else may have been responsible for the attacks.”

     So why didn’t Comey reopen the case? One possible explanation is that he didn’t want to upset Mueller and the FBI officials who engaged in the cover-up. He had approved their targeting of, and conclusions about, Hatfill.

     In return, Mueller, as special counsel in Russia-gate, can be expected to do Comey a big favor. He will not probe Comey’s malfeasance in using the phony “Trump Dossier” to investigate President Trump and his team. That is the real story—how Hillary donors financed by pro-Russian interests hired a former British agent to concoct an assortment of charges against Trump.

     Mueller is a company man; he will protect the FBI and its former director and friend. The fix is in.

     This is a far more important story than Comey hiding in the drapes. Writing about drapes may sound silly, but it is yet another way for the media to suggest that Comey was afraid of Trump trying to influence his inquiry into Russia-gate.

     The story is not how Trump influenced the investigation, but rather how Comey used the phony “Trump Dossier” to go down dead-end roads

     The story is not how Trump influenced the investigation, but rather how Comey used the phony “Trump Dossier” to go down dead-end roads and produce no results. It’s the anthrax investigation all over again.

     Mueller’s job is to pump life into Comey’s fiasco, and turn the tables on Trump for firing Comey.

     Meanwhile, corruption in the FBI goes unreported, and Congress fails to do adequate oversight of the intelligence community, which is supposed to keep us safe.

     Retired Foreign Service officer and intelligence analyst Kenneth J. Dillon told Accuracy in Media, “My research on the 2011 anthrax mailings case suggests that Mueller was responsible for the suicide of the alleged but wrongly accused mailer, Bruce Ivins, as well as for the subsequent cover-up. Mueller appears to have lied to a Senate committee about Ivins, and destroyed key alibi evidence for him. The new FBI director needs to reopen the anthrax mailings investigation and get to the bottom of this shocking and outrageous case.”

     Dillon’s research indicates that Ivins prepared the anthrax to test vaccines, but the anthrax was sent to various civilian labs, including one infiltrated by an al-Qaeda operative. The anthrax was transferred to another al-Qaeda operative, Abderraouf Jdey, and used in the attacks. “There was a very lax attitude in the pre-9/11 era relating to the handling of anthrax,” Dillon says.

     Why would this fact be suppressed? “The FBI was embarrassed by the fact that they had detained Jdey in August of 2001 and had let him go,” he says. Jdey was free, not only to mail the anthrax letters but according to Dillon’s theory, he went on to become the shoebomber on Flight 587, which crashed on November 12, 2001, and was conveniently blamed on co-pilot error.

     “If indeed Abderraouf Jdey brought down Flight 587 with a shoe bomb, the U.S. Government would have been deeply negligent in permitting an al Qaeda operative whose whereabouts were known to carry out this attack,” Dillon notes.

     Mueller has fooled a lot of people. His appointment is good news for the Swamp but bad news for Trump.

     Carl M. Cannon seems to think the outcome is preordained, noting the attitude of “official Washington” and what the “insiders” want to see happen—impeachment leading to Trump’s ouster.

     Unless Trump picks a new FBI director who will get to the bottom of the FBI’s corruption by shining the light on the mishandling of the anthrax probe, Trump may be hiding in the drapes before the Russia-gate investigation is over.

GREAT NEWS! Finally States are doing what needs to be done! This article, from another blogger (highly recommend reading his blog found at https://politicalcelcraft.org) who is most informative in his writings:

Arizona Governor Signs Bill Nullifying Capital Gains Taxes On Legal Tender Of Gold And Silver: Legalizing The United States Constitution

24 May 2017 by Volubrjotr


Legalizing The United States Constitution in Arizona.

On Monday, Gov. Doug Ducey signed a bill into law that eliminates states capital gains taxes on gold and silver specie. The tax repeal will not only benefit Arizonans who invest in gold and silver, it will also facilitate their use as currency and undermine the Federal Reserve’s monopoly on money.

Rep. Mark Finchem (R-Tucson) sponsored HB2014. The legislation eliminates state capital gains taxes on income “derived from the exchange of one kind of legal tender for another kind of legal tender.” The bill defines legal tender as “a medium of exchange, including specie, that is authorized by the United States Constitution or Congress for the payment of debts, public charges, taxes and dues.” “Specie” means coins having precious metal content.

In effect, passage into law will “legalize the Constitution” by treating gold and silver specie as money.

The new law will go into effect Aug. 9, 2017.

Getting Gov. Ducey’s signature on the bill was a major victory, and the culmination of more than five years of work by supporters of sound money in the Grand Canyon State. Similar legislation passed the legislature in 2013, 2015, and 2016, but Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed the first two bills, and Gov Doug Ducey killed last year’s effort.

Grassroots support was crucial in pushing this legislation across the finish line this year. A dedicated group of volunteers lobbied for the bill, and Ron Paul traveled to Arizona and testified on its behalf.

We ought not to tax money – and that’s a good idea. It makes no sense to tax money,” he said. “Paper is not money, it’s fraud.”

The new law’s impact goes beyond mere tax policy. During an event after his Senate committee testimony, Paul pointed out that it’s really about the size and scope of government.

If you’re for less government, you want sound money. The people who want big government, they don’t want sound money. They want to deceive you and commit fraud. They want to print the money. They want a monopoly. They want to get you conditioned, as our schools have conditioned us, to the point where deficits don’t matter.”


The new law allows taxpayers to deduct the amount of any net capital gain derived from the exchange of one kind of legal tender for another kind of legal tender or specie (gold and silver coins) from their gross income on their state income tax. In other words, individuals buying gold or silver bullion, or utilizing gold and silver in a transaction, would no longer be subject to state taxes on the exchange.

What the IRS has figured out at the federal level is to target inflation as a gain. They call it capital gains,” Finchem said during a committee hearing. He noted that the bill would help Arizona residents “protect their conversion of one kind of currency for another.”

Passage into law marks an important first step towards currency competition. If sound money gains a foothold in the marketplace against Federal Reserve notes, the people would be able to choose the time-tested stability of gold and silver over the central bank’s rapidly-depreciating paper currency. The freedom of choice expanded by HB2014 will help allow Arizona residents to secure the purchasing power of their money.

Ron Paul said he considered the Arizona bill to be “very important” because it would also serve as an educational effort for other states.

“The responsibility is on the states to follow the Constitution,” Paul said.


Currently, all debts and taxes in Arizona must be paid with either Federal Reserve Notes (dollars), authorized as legal tender by Congress, or with coins issued by the U.S. Treasury — very few of which have gold or silver in them.

But the United States Constitution states in Article I, Section 10, “No State shall…make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.”

The Arizona law takes a step towards that constitutional requirement, ignored for decades in every state. Such a tactic would undermine the monopoly or the Federal Reserve by introducing competition into the monetary system.

Professor William Greene is an expert on constitutional tender and said when people in multiple states actually start using gold and silver instead of Federal Reserve Notes, it would effectively nullify the Federal Reserve and end the federal government’s monopoly on money.

“Over time, as residents of the state use both Federal Reserve notes and silver and gold coins, the fact that the coins hold their value more than Federal Reserve notes do will lead to a “reverse Gresham’s Law” effect, where good money (gold and silver coins) will drive out bad money (Federal Reserve notes).

As this happens, a cascade of events can begin to occur, including the flow of real wealth toward the state’s treasury, an influx of banking business from outside of the state – as people in other states carry out their desire to bank with sound money – and an eventual outcry against the use of Federal Reserve notes for any transactions.”

Once things get to that point, Federal Reserve notes would become largely unwanted and irrelevant for ordinary people. Nullifying the Fed on a state by state level can get us there.

The Tenth Amendment Center contributed to this report.

%d bloggers like this: