We’re excited to be able offer the first presentation release from the 2018 ESTC!

Eric Dollard’s presentation, History, Theory and Practice of the Electrical Utility System, is 5 HOURS LONG and contains some very disruptive information that should be a serious concern to National Security! This redefines the very definition of what it means to be comprehensive.

Get 25% off of this presentation with this coupon code: EPD25

Buy now: http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=115

There is definitely plenty of history of what preceded the grid and how it developed over time, but also – how it is being radically sabotaged into something that will actually assist an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) into causing even more damage than can be imagined – and it will be delivered right into YOUR home. This is what Eric Dollard has been wanting to expose for the last few years when he discovered a massive amount of electrical transmission interference in the ground during his telluric experiments.

Is this degradation of the grid intentional or has this been done simply because the art of power engineering has deteriortated to the point of incompetence? It’s up to you to decide, but if you currently do not believe in conspiracy theories, this presentation might just change your mind because the evidence is is hiding in plain sight. Just wait until Eric points it out – and it is shocking that it is all around us and this is not an exaggeration.

A portion of the proceeds from this presentation will go to EPD Laboratories, Inc. to help pay off the building to support the work of Eric Dollard so get a copy and encourage your friends to get a copy too.

Get 25% off of this presentation with this coupon code: EPD25

Buy now: http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=115

Courtesy of
Emediapress.com

2018 ENERGY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS RELEASED

IMPORTANT: After completing payment in the shopping cart, click the OK button and scroll down and click the GREEN button to access the download. Details are here: http://emediapress.com/download-help/
This is INSTANT ACCESS – you do not need to wait for an email to come with download instructions – you’re already there.

ERIC DOLLARD – HISTORY, THEORY & PRACTICE OF THE ELECTRICAL UTILITY SYSTEM: http://www.emediapress.com/go.php?offer=&pid=115

 

Advertisements

If you are interested in finding lots of great information on alternative energy options, inventions, and products click the following link:

http://emediapress.com/affiliates/reports/pdf/2018ESTCmag_ypcluouahf.pdf

There is an Energy Conference set for next weekend, and the magazine will be updated regularly with the new information presented at the Conference, so check back often! The new information will be added as it becomes available. Meanwhile, there are a lot of great articles and products already available for you at the above link.

There is a lot of information available regarding smart meters- and why we need to stick with the analog meters- available at http://stopsmartmeters,org and at http://smartmetereducationnetwork.com

These sites have great information on the dangers, the health effects, and whether or not they actually save you money- or whether the plan is to ultimately control your energy usage by instituting quotas. These smart meters enable your utility companies to shut off your service remotely (without your consent or without warning).

Many places have already outlawed the installation the these smart meters, as they do not actually even meet FCC standards (See Cindy Sage’s report here: Cindy Sage Says Smart Meters are Not Meeting FCC Standards | Stop Smart Meters Irvine ). The have been known to cause fires, and the adverse health effects are numerous and have been well documented by the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (see report here: American Academy of Environmental Medicine calls for a halt to wireless smart meters – EMF Safety Network ).

It is time for us to become self reliant. Self-reliance is the only way we will preserve our freedom.

Please check out the information available at the above links. It is time for us to take control of our lives.

George Soros’ goal is to destroy any sovereign nation- especially the U.S. He is the Rothschilds man-in-place to force all countries into a One World Gov’t- with them doing the governing.

Anytime you find behind-the-scenes funding from Soros, you can bet it is being done to the detriment of the people.

Many mistakenly think this call for an Article V Convention will assert more rights for the States. The truth is, the States will have NO say at all.

What this proposed Convention DOES do is put the re-writing of our Constitution in the hands of Congress- alone. Can you trust Congress to do what is best for us all? Do you honestly think this Congress is capable of protecting your rights when, given this Convention, THEY re-write our Constitution? The Convention would instead give them the ultimate power-grab tool- and you bet you can then kiss your rights good-bye! This push for a Convention, as outlined in Article V, is VERY DANGEROUS.

Here’s an important letter detailing what it involves:

Dear Americans,

I need your help.

Powerful Leftists have joined forces with some misguided conservatives on the Right and together, they are promoting a national convention to revise the U.S. Constitution.

Your most valued freedoms could be utterly destroyed.

The most vocal Leftists, like Wolf Pac, Lawrence Lessig, and George Soros, want to rewrite and limit your First and Second Amendment rights.

You can bet there will be anti-family, pro-abortion delegates to such a convention, seeking to enshrine their favored amendments in the Constitution, too.

Even Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders came out in support of the idea.

But sadly, attacks on the U.S. Constitution aren’t just coming from the extreme Left — they’re coming from all sides.

Convention of States, a group that has gone to great lengths to smear and attack conservatives opposed to this idea, isn’t even pretending to want a convention “limited” to a single issue; rather, they want a convention that covers a wide array of issues.

These groups boldly claim a series of amendments can put our country on a wiser path.

But why would politicians uphold their oaths to a new Constitution if they are violating their oaths to the Constitution we have now?

Is it worth the risk of losing our most cherished rights to find out if they will?

I hope you’ll agree that the risk is too extreme and sign your petition opposing this terrible idea by clicking here.

The authority for such a procedure is Article V of our Constitution, so they are calling their plan of action an Article V Convention.

However, they are fooling themselves when they suggest that Article V creates a path to bypass Congress with a “convention of states.”

In a convention setting, the U.S. Congress would have a major say in how the process will work.

The only power the states have under Article V is the opportunity to submit an “application” (petition) asking Congress to call a convention.

Hundreds of such applications have been submitted over the years, with widely different purposes and wording. Many applications were later rescinded, and some purport to make the application valid for only a particular amendment such as a federal balanced budget or congressional term limits.

Article V states that Congress “shall” call a convention on the application of two-thirds of state legislatures, or thirty-four (34) of them.

If Congress ever decides to act, Article V gives Congress exclusive power to issue the “Call” for a convention to propose “amendments” (plural).

The “Call” is the governing document which determines all the basic rules such as where and when a convention will be held, who is eligible to be a delegate (will current office-holders be eligible?), how delegates will be apportioned, how expenses will be paid, and who will be the chairman.

Article V also gives Congress the power to determine whether the three-fourths of the states required for ratification of amendments can ratify by the state legislature’s action or by state conventions.

Do you trust the current U.S. Congress to determine the rules for how the Constitution will be rewritten?

The most important question to which there is no answer is this: how will convention delegates be apportioned?

Will each state have one vote (no matter how many delegates it sends), which was the rule in the 1787 Philadelphia convention?

Or will the convention be apportioned according to population (like Congress or the Electoral College)?

Nothing in Article V gives the states any power to make this fundamental decision.

If Congress decides apportionment will be determined by population, more populous states will control the outcome.

Do you want California or New York deciding how the U.S. Constitution should read?

Article V doesn’t give any power to the states to propose actual constitutional amendments, or to decide which amendments will be considered by the convention.

Now imagine Democratic and Republican conventions meeting in the same hall and trying to agree on constitutional changes. Imagine the gridlock in drafting a constitutional plank by caucuses led by Sarah Palin and Al Sharpton.

Everything else about how an Article V Convention would function — including its agenda — is anybody’s guess.

Advocates of an Article V convention can hope and speculate, but they cannot assure us that any of their plans will come true.

If we follow the model of the 1787 Convention, will the deliberations be secret? Are you kidding me? Nothing is secret any more.

What are the plans to deal with protesters at what would surely be the biggest media event of the year, if not of the century? It will be flooded with agitators from the gun-control lobby, the gay lobby, the abortion lobby, the green lobby, plus experienced protesters — like union thugs — trained and even paid with George Soros money.

There is no proof that the VIPs promoting an Article V convention have any first-hand knowledge of the politics or procedures of a contested national convention. Don’t they realize that the convention will set its own agenda and that states will have no say over which amendments are considered?

To see how a convention chairman wielding the gavel can manipulate outcomes, take for instance the 2012 Democratic National Convention.

A delegate tried to add a reference to God to the party platform, but the chairman ruthlessly called the vote wrong even though we all saw on television that the “Noes” won the vote.

The whole Article V “Convention of States” process is a prescription for political chaos.

Alas, I don’t see any George Washingtons, James Madisons or Ben Franklins around today who could do as good a job as the Founding Fathers, and I’m worried about the men who think they can.

That’s why it’s imperative you click here to sign your petition opposing all bills calling for an Article V Con Con.

Phyllis Schlafly

Founder, Eagle Forum

Ed Martin

President, Eagle Forum

P.S. A few misguided conservatives have joined with the Left to push for a constitutional convention.

But they are fooling themselves when they suggest that Article V creates a path to bypass Congress with a “convention of states.”

The laws are quite clear: In a convention setting, the U.S. Congress would get a major say in how the process will work.

Article V clearly states that Congress “shall” call a convention on the application of two-thirds of state legislatures, or thirty-four (34) of them.

But how will Congress count valid applications?

And Congress will determine all the guiding rules for a Convention, such as:

  • Where and when a convention will be held
  • Who is eligible to be a delegate – will current office-holders be eligible?
  • How delegates will be apportioned
  • How expenses will be paid
  • Who the chairman will be
  • How convention delegates will be apportioned

Do you trust the U.S. Congress to determine the rules for how our Constitution will be rewritten?

Do you want California or New York deciding how the U.S. Constitution should read?

Even worse, Article V doesn’t give any power to the states to propose constitutional amendments, or to decide which amendments will be considered by the convention.

With our U.S. Congress involved, the Article V “Convention of States” process is a prescription for political chaos.

Sadly, there are very few George Washingtons in Washington D.C. whom I trust to handle the responsibility of a constitutional convention at this point in history.

That’s why it’s imperative you click here to sign your petition opposing all bills calling for an Article V Con Con.

 

You can find out more here:

https://www.jbs.org/con-con

Note: Only six more states are needed to trigger the calling of a risky Article V constitutional convention.

History Lesson on Your Social Security Card

Just in case some of you young whippersnappers
(& some older ones) didn’t know this, here’s the history of our Social Security. You know, that bit that gets taken out before you get your paycheck…

It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show
it to your family and friends. They need a little history
lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether
you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.

Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated
the number and card were not to be used for identification
purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now
has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway
and the message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed.

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be
Completely voluntary,

No longer Voluntary

2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
Incomes into the Program,

Now, it’s 7.65%
on the first $90,000.

3.) That the money the participants elected to put
into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year,

No longer tax deductible

4.) That the money the participants put into the
independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the
general operating fund,  would only be used
to fund the Social Security Retirement Program,
and no other Government program, however,
Under Johnson the money was moved to The General Fund and Spent

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never
be taxed as income.

Under Clinton & Gore
Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are
now receiving a Social Security check every month —
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put
away’ — you may be interested in the following:
———— ——— ——— ——— ——— ——— —-
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the
general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically
controlled House and Senate.
———- ——— ——— ——— ——— ——— ——— —
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.
———- ——— ——— ——— ——— ——— ——— —–
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the
‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
———– ——— ——— ——— ——— ——— ——— –
Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants?

A: That’s right!
Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,
began to receive Social Security payments! The
Democratic Party gave these payments to them,
even though these immigrants never paid a dime into it!
———— — ———— ——— —– ———— ——— ———
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA),
the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans
want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!

Oh, and don’t forget…Now, they refer to OUR Social Security Retirement Fund Annuity checks as…an ‘ENTITLEMENT’!

As if they are giving us something other than our own money!

THAT money is money WE put into their hands for ‘safe-keeping’, on the belief that it would be there when we retire(d) to support ourselves on.

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of
awareness will be planted and maybe changes will
result from enough people speaking out. It’s worth a try.

How many people will YOU send this to?
Actions speak louder than bumper stickers

PLEASE DO KEEP THIS ONE ROLLING ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

The problem is not about guns. The problem is the psychiatric INDUSTRY.

Patients are nothing but riff-raff. The only useful purposes they serve are to help us earn a living and to provide learning material. In any case, we cannot help them.”Sigmund Freud

There are currently MILLIONS of people on drugs dolled out by the psychiatric industry. There are no medical tests that can prove anyone is “mentally ill” and any diagnosis of mental disorder is based solely on opinion—in fact, a simple checklist of behaviors.

The definitive ‘authoritative book that ‘defines’ over 300 ‘mental disorders is nothing but a list of NORMAL human behaviors that those in the psychiatric industry shuffle around, put a ‘new’ label on a set of behaviors, and then prescribe dangerous, mind-altering drugs to ‘treat’ this made-up ‘disorder.

ALL SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDERS ARE ARBITRARILY INVENTED, NAMED, LABELED, DESCRIBED, AND CATEGORIZED by a committee of psychiatrists, from menus of human behaviors.

There is a strong working relationship between the psychiatric industry and the Big Pharma drug industry. The drug industry creates an array of drugs to ‘treat’ these fictional mental disorders.

Common Psychiatric Drugs (as well as those Being Given to Children) Are Documented by International Drug Regulatory Agencies to Cause Heart Attack, Stroke, Diabetes, Hallucinations, Violence, Mania, Homicide, Aggression, Depression, Suicide and Death.

This is not opinion. This is documented fact by international drug regulatory agencies.

As long as these drugs are being given out at an ever-increasing pace, the more mass shootings will happen.

From Jon Rappoport:

“There is a problem. It is chilling. Pharmaceutical companies, which manufacture drug after drug for “mental disorders,” are doing everything they can to cover up the drugs’ connection to violence.

They use their lawyers and PR people—and their influence over the press—to scrub the connection.

And now, one typical, disturbing, official reaction to every new mass shooting is: build more community mental health facilities.”

This problem will get worse and worse. The schools are ordered to ‘test’ children and tag them with a ‘mental illness’…why? Because the schools get THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS. The more students that are diagnosed with disorders, the more money the school gets.

There are powerful multi-billion-dollar interests at stake. This is the main reason these industries have not been successfully challenged.

These children, having their minds altered by these dangerous drugs, grow up. And yet, people wonder why we are seeing more and more mass shootings…

It’s a no brainer. The psychiatric industry must be SHUT DOWN and THE DRUGS MUST BE PULLED FROM THE MARKET.

Doing so would GREATLY reduce  the opioid problem,and mass shootings would GREATLY diminish.

The psychiatric and drug industries CREATED the problems we are seeing today.

It is time for us to recognize this, and END IT.

Then we can turn our attention to doing everything we can to undo the problems they have created.

This is NOT a unintentional issue we are facing. The Congressional Record of 1963 has recorded within it the 45 Goals of Communism. Below are listed some of those goals:

#3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

#32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

#38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

#39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

#37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

Clearly, the problem is not our Constitution, nor guns.

In order to address the issues of mass shootings and the opioid problem, we must first stop the propaganda that everyone and their brother has a ‘mental disorder’. We must SHUT DOWN psychiatric industry, and STOP the drug industry from creating these dangerous drugs. If we must shut down the FDA, who is working WITH the pharmaceutical industry (hiding and changing test results so drug companies can market these dangerous drugs), then that is what we must do.

Then we can start to work on whatever it takes to correct the damages done by these malevolent industries and those who are working against us on all fronts.

The Second Amendment was put into our Constitution so as to have the Law of the Land behind it. It states our UNALIENABLE RIGHT to bear arms shall NOT be infringed.

Here’s the definition of unalienable:

Unalienable: incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred.”

Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, pg. 1523

The right to bear arms allows us to protect ourselves, our families, and our country from tyranny- from those who seek to destroy our very freedom.

What we are witnessing today is tyrannical undermining of everything we hold dear.

We CAN stop it. It is upon us to do so.

 

A bit late on the Merry Christmas, however, one will have that when one cannot get logged in to their blog… But do hope everyone had a great Christmas, and hope you all have a happy, healthy, and prosperous New Year!

Received this recently:

“Hey all you PLAYERS who are being paid MILLIONS – Yeah, YOU! What is stopping you from opening a center where people can learn a trade so they can make a decent living? Or do you actually believe that ranting around, burning our national flag, or refusing to stand for our national anthem is the most effective way to draw attention to a self-inflicted issue?

Don’t think the ‘poor’ Black has a self-inflicted Issue? Dealing drugs and going into other peoples’ businesses and homes, stealing things, and then selling them- acting like ya’ll above the law- and havin’ an attitude about it all- being a punk-ass whiner instead of applying yourself to something positive…and then ya’ll wonder why ya get your ass beat when shtf? Seriously?

Got news for ya- ya don’t HAVE to live in the projects- you don’t HAVE to take some piss-ant low-pay job (which most don’t even try to do anyway)- you don’t HAVE to do what all yo bros do to make ends meet. Heck, ya could go BE a cop, and see how patient ya’ll would be when confronted with twits doin’ stupid shit (and yeah, there’s bad cops, but also good ones, too).

Or you could grow a backbone, go learn a trade or other line of work that pays well- and learn to do it really well, so you can get paid top dollar. That may require you sacrificing “livin’ in the hood” for a bit, because the money and good-paying opportunities are generally not floatin’ ’round the Hood. Yeah- it means you will have to go somewhere else. Yeah, that requires you movin’ outta yo ‘comfort zone’.

Why don’t ya ask some of yo bros that are kickin’ it Big Time if they’d move BACK to the Hood? They’d probably find that question pretty funny.

No, they livin’ in their Big Houses, with their Fancy Cars, and they got themselves Big Name Lawyers and Fat Payin’ Contracts….not too likely THEY’D be willin’ to move Back to the Hood- if they even CAME from the Hood. Most of them boys’ parents had already busted out of the hood years ago- living in Suburbia with a decent job and all; makin’ sure their kid stayed in school and was supportive of him bein’ in sports and all.

And, now, here’s their spoiled rotten kid, PLAYING for a living- running under a National Banner, being sponsored by big payin’ companies who get their pay from Joe Citizen who likes to watch a GAME… screamin’ and rantin’ and kneelin’ and generally being totally disrespectful – biting the hand that feeds him- for a ’cause’, an issue brought on by actions that generally could have been avoided.

If these Big-Time PLAYERS really want to help their bros, they could be founding centers where people have the opportunity to learn a trade or other line of work that will offer better opportunity for them than bein’ on the street getting into trouble. Maybe ya’ll can encourage them to do something positive with all their millions of dollars – offer scholarships, build learning centers, etc. –

‘Cause right now, they lookin’ the Fool. That’s right. They got millions of dollars, and they doin’ nothin’ for you wid it. They blamin’ America, or cops, or ‘Whitey’ instead of realizin’ it’s an individual’s problem. It’s the individual who makes the choices in their own life.

In order to make changes in yo life, you gots to stop makin’ excuses. You got to just do what’s right. You ain’t no victim;yo ain’t no slave. You got choices. Every day. Stop playin’ the fool and make choices that gonna get you where you want to be in life. Plain an’ simple.

And you Big-Time Players…go DO something with all that money to change the situation. You got no excuse for your disrespectful behavior. Don’t like what’s goin’ on? Change it. Or leave the country. See how well you do elsewhere. ‘Cause you actin’ all ignorant and simple-minded. Shame on you! How yo gonna change things actin’ all stupid?

What yo gonna be? A Stumbling Block or a Stepping Stone?”

There are some today that are attempting to change the way we vote. Before we are hood-winked into allowing something detrimental to happen, it is critical that we fully understand why our voting system is set up the way it is.
In order to make informed decisions, we must first examine the facts and understand what is at stake.
The following is an article just published by JBS.org :
Save Your Freedom From a Tyranny of the Majority:
No National Popular Vote!
Democracies Lead to a Tyranny of the Majority
The Founding Fathers gave us a constitutional Republic, not a Democracy, in order to prevent the loss of our rights and freedoms to a tyranny of the majority. The Electoral College is one of the key aspects of the Constitution for accomplishing this purpose.

What Is the Electoral College?

https://www.votervoice.net/BroadcastLinks/c7QPA4_mnFE37oe9QhatPg

Click on the above video or link to get a quick understanding of what the Electoral College is and how it protects our rights and freedoms from a tyranny of the majority.

Basically, the Electoral College provides an indirect method (Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution) for the election of the president and vice-president. Although voters in each state think they are voting directly for the president and vice-president of their choice every four years, they are actually voting directly for electors that are pledged to vote for the various presidential and vice-presidential candidates on the ballot.

Since the number of electors alloted for each state is based on the number of congressional districts for that state plus two (based on the two senators in each state), California (based on its very large population), has 55 electors and Wyoming (based on its very small population), has only 3 electors. The total number of electors is 538, and the number needed for a presidential candidate to win is 270 (a majority).

Benefits of the Electoral College
Although there are many arguments for either keeping the Electoral College or replacing it with a national popular vote, we’ll only consider a few of the important ones for keeping the Electoral College.

First, keeping the Electoral College affirms the important role of the states in our constitutional Republic (as enshrined in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution), which is often referred to as federalism. Discarding the Electoral College in favor of a national popular vote would be a big step toward converting our Republic into a Democracy. As explained below, states that adopt the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) legislation agree to allot all of their electoral votes to the presidential candidate that wins the national popular vote. That means that if your state adopts the NPVIC legislation, then your state’s Electoral College votes will be alloted to the winner of the national popular vote for president, even if the majority of voters in your state vote for a different candidate.

Second, the number of votes each state is allotted in the Electoral College provides an upper limit on the influence on presidential elections exerted by large population states. For example, with the Electoral College, California’s influence on elections compared to Wyoming’s influence is capped by the ratio of 55 (electoral votes) to 3 (electoral votes). No matter how many more millions of votes are received by the winning candidate as compared to the losing candidate in California, that candidate would still only get 55 votes in the Electoral College, and Wyoming would still get its 3 votes. This feature of the Electoral College helps prevent the tyranny of the majority problem associated with democracies.

Third, with the Electoral College widespread voter fraud in a large population state like California, a safe, blue state, would very rarely change the outcome of a presidential election because under the “winner take all” rules of nearly all states, if the winner gets only one vote more statewide than the opponent, the winner gets (in the example of California) 55 electoral votes. If the winner would receive millions more votes through voter fraud instead, he or she would still get only 55 electoral votes. The same would be true for large population red states. Therefore, the Electoral College serves to prevent voter fraud from changing who wins presidential elections.

The National Popular Vote Movement to Replace the Electoral College
Now, over two centuries after the Electoral College went into effect, there is a highly funded movement, the National Popular Vote movement (NPV), to replace this key component of our constitutional Republic.

The NPV movement is a clever way to convert our presidential elections from being determined by the Electoral College to being determined by the national popular vote without the necessity of a constitutional amendment. This “workaround” is based on the power of each state, as provided in Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, to appoint its electors “in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct.” However, since about half of the states would be subject to this completely new procedure for electing the president without giving their consent, a constitutional amendment would appear to be required. In fact, once the NPV Interstate Compact would reach 270 electoral votes, then theoretically, the remaining states would become forever irrelevant in presidential elections. In practice, they would probably join the compact just to avoid this presidential election limbo. But that’s no way to change such an important part of our constitutional system of government.

In 2006 the NPV movement began introducing NPVIC (National Popular Vote Interstate Compact) legislation in various state legislatures. This legislation was designed so that each state that joined the interstate compact agreed to award all of its electoral votes in presidential elections to the candidate that wins the popular vote in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. However, this assignment of electoral votes based on the winner of the national popular vote will not go into effect until the states joining this compact have a combined total of 270 or more electoral votes.

NPVIC Status
As of September 2017, the NPVIC legislation has been adopted by ten states and the District of Columbia with a total of 165 electoral votes. This amounts to 61% of the 270 votes needed to legally activate the NPV interstate compact. The states which have passed the NPVIC legislation are Maryland (2007), New Jersey (2008), Illinois (2008), Hawaii (2008), Washington (2009), Massachusetts (2010), the District of Columbia (2010), Vermont (2011), California (2011), Rhode Island (2013), and New York (2014).

What’s Next for the NPV Movement?
Thanks to “Is the Electoral College Doomed?” published in the September/October POLITICO Magazine (yes, we have to be wary of this source), we have some insights into the current strategy of the NPV promoters. Tim Alberta, the author of this article, was one of 11 political journalists who were flown to Panama in mid-February on a “booze-soaked junket” to partake in an “educational seminar” on election reform by NPVIC backers. Many state legislators had already been treated to this type of seminar. Then, beginning last fall, the NPVIC backers began including journalists and opinion leaders in these seminars.

In short, Alberta learned that the NPV promoters have a problem. All of the states that have adopted the NPVIC legislation are blue states. They need to start getting some red states to sign on to be successful. However, now that Trump has won the presidency by virtue of his majority in the Electoral College, but without winning the national popular vote, why would Republican-led state legislatures want to sign on to the NPVIC? If the NPVIC had been in effect in 2016, Clinton would be the president now. Hence, the NPV movement has a big problem in the red states.

So, Alberta learned that the NPV strategy for 2018 is “is to kick off the year by targeting not just any Republican states but Utah and Oklahoma – two of the most conservative in the union – in pursuit of a symbolic breakthrough.” The NPV leadership believes that if they get these two states, they’ll end up getting four or five more red states.

What to Do?
If you’re in Utah or Oklahoma, or any other red state that will be in session in 2018, begin visiting, phoning, and emailing your state legislators now in opposition to adopting the NPVIC legislation. Don’t be overconfident that the NPVIC legislation will never pass in your red state. Surprisingly, the Oklahoma Senate approved an NPVIC bill in 2014 and the Arizona House did so in 2016.  If your state legislators are Republican, your first point should be to ask why would they support the NPV legislation since it would serve to almost guarantee that Democrats would win the presidency in the foreseeable future. A second point is that adopting the NPVIC would serve to dramatically reduce the role of states in presidential elections. Not only would the NPVIC deliver your state’s electoral votes to the national popular vote winner even if the majority of voters in your state voted for a different candidate, but a very large number of states (likely a majority) would have the whole presidential election process, known as the Electoral College (as provided in Article II of the Constitution), transformed without their consent and without their participation in a constitutional amendment process. A third point would be how the Electoral College caps the influence of the large population states and therefore helps prevent the tyranny of the majority problem. A fourth point would be to mention how the Electoral College helps prevent voter fraud from changing who wins presidential elections.

If you’re in Utah or Oklahoma, or any other red state, and you’re talking to a Democratic state legislator, you should of course, forget about making the first point mentioned in the previous paragraph and go on to make points 2-4.

If you’re in a blue state that still hasn’t adopted the NPVIC legislation and that will be in session in 2018, please contact your state legislators in opposition to the NPVIC legislation. Make the points detailed in the previous two paragraphs.

If you’re in a state that has already passed the NPVIC legislation, you should work with your state legislators to get a bill introduced to repeal the NPVIC legislation for the reasons discussed in the immediately preceding paragraphs. So far, such repeal bills have been introduced in Maryland, New Jersey, and Washington, but have failed.

Action Summary
Visit and phone your state legislators in opposition to the replacement of the Electoral College with the national popular vote for presidential elections. See the “What to Do?” section above for talking points. Click here to look up office addresses and phone numbers.

Click here to email your state legislators in opposition to the national popular vote for presidential elections using the prewritten, editable message provided.

Thanks.

It is absolutely incredible what some will attempt to do.

Currently, there are many who are being funded by the likes of George Soros and his multitude of falsely labeled ‘humanitarian’ organizations to cause as much division and unrest as possible. After all, a country divided is much easier to bring down than one who stands strongly united.

Yet these protesters- many of whom are paid to protest- do not see that they are being used. They never consider that ultimately, after their ‘purpose’ has been served, they will be discarded and come to the same ugly fate, by the very people paying them to protest today, as the rest of the populace that they are protesting against.

They do not consider that all this activity is deliberately designed to eventually work against them, as well as those they are targeting.

They never consider that the statutes they want to destroy are a testament to all of our history. Our history, together, as a nation of diverse peoples, belongs to all of our people. Once the history has been removed, those who are paying for the destruction, via protests, will re-write that history to ‘read’ whatever they choose it to be. That is dangerous because it causes people to disconnect from their ancestors, their past and our true history.

These same protestors are obviously unaware that America’s history is a history that actually had MORE white slaves than we ever had black ones.  They also are unaware that Robert E. Lee was a Democrat. They are disrespecting our history- a history we all share, be that good, bad, or indifferent. They do not have the right to destroy what belongs to all of us, yet that is what they are doing- taking our history away from all of us.

They will not stop there. No, there are those among these protestors that think someone (white) owes them- simply because of the color of their skin. Who, then, owes all the descendants of the white slaves, pray tell?

Now, we read in the Louisville Eccentric Observer, of one person, named Chennelle Helm, a self-proclaimed Black Lives Matter Louisville organizer, who is now demanding that white people give up their houses to black or brown people. She is stating that whites re-budget their finances so they can financially support black and/or brown people. She wants whites to will their inheritance to black or brown people, and promotes publicly harassing anyone who may be suspect as a racist.

Among other things. Seriously.

Perhaps  if she was willing to put half the energy into getting herself into a responsible financial position, rather than screaming for free handouts from those willing to work hard, she may feel entirely different about the matter. After all, doing so may enable her to purchase her own home, like so many – of all various colors – have done.

If one could directly speak to Ms. Helm, they may state something like:

Honey, NO ONE is going to save you- YOU have to save yourself. NO ONE OWES YOU ANYTHING. If you want something, you have to put in the time and effort to earn it.

Those are the lessons many home owners learned. And because they knew they were responsible for how they ultimately lived, they willingly put in the time and effort. Very few were ever ‘handed’ their home or their means of living. Most worked for it, and did what it took. They may not have even liked their jobs, but they stuck to it, and did what was required in order to secure the financing necessary to purchase their home.

And those who purchase homes pay their mortgage (‘rent’ owed to the bank) every month- on time- without the government doing it for them. They do not get assistance; they have to earn that money themselves (in addition to being taxed on their wages which enables the government to pay the assistance programs, like welfare, rent subsidy, food stamps and medicaid, to those who don’t chose to do the same). And then in 30 years or so, they FINALLY get the papers from the bank that says they NOW own that home. Sadly, darlin’, there is NO such thing as a ‘free lunch’. Even welfare recipients pay a price for that hand-out.

Just because you are among the ‘generational poor’ doesn’t mean YOU cannot change that. It takes a bit of determination, but it can be done.

There are no ‘victims’ here in Life. YOU make your life what you want it to be. YOU are totally responsible for every aspect of your life- whether or not you acknowledge that to be fact.

Privileged white? Is that a joke? People of color in America have all kinds of ‘bennies’ just because of the color of their skin. Higher education? No problem, honey- there’s a dozen funds to draw from IF you are a ‘person of color’. Can’t pass the tests? No problem- the schools lowered that standard back in the sixties. Heck, there’s even SPECIAL loans for people of color so they can purchase a home.

So stop whining and screaming, and go find out what is available, and get yourself into a home if that’s what you want. Of course, you’ll have to be earning something so as to make that monthly mortgage payment like all the other home owners…without assistance from the government.

Most people are living paycheck to paycheck and struggling having little if anything left over. The bills get paid, and there’s maybe a couple of dollars to get you through another week. Those home owners you are so clearly jealous of struggle every month to meet their bills. It’s no picnic, but it may be better than living in an apartment complex with that ‘subsidized reduced rent’ and food stamps and having to fill out endless paperwork to satisfy government agencies….

You better start realizing that no person, regardless of color, is going to give up their home to anyone after all the hard work it took them to get one. No one is going to give you what they worked for just because you have a different skin color.- regardless of whether or not they have any heir.

You best get a grip on our true history. The war between the states was NOT over ‘slavery’; it was because the there were certain persons who wanted to levy an extremely high tax on the southern states (who were in a better financial bracket; they were wealthier), so they could build a railroad that would only service the northern portion of the country. Had that railroad system been designed to equally serve their states, there would not have been such opposition.

At that time, the southern states grew the crops that fed our nation, as well as the crops that material was made from; the northern states, having a much shorter growing season, was where the factories were located that made the cloth and shoes for the nation.

Because of the heavy tax, the southern states wanted to leave the union. If they did so, all the other states that could not grow their own food in enough abundance, due to their short growing season, would obviously suffer. Those wanting the railroad, and those working in the factories, did not want the southern states to leave the union- it would be devastating for the northern states if that happened. The South, on the other hand, could easily support themselves, and they figured they could learn to make cloth and shoes, as well. The South could easily be self-reliant, whereas the northern states could not. Those wanting the railroad wanted to force the South into staying in the union- against the South’s wishes. Hence, the war.

The North did not have the financial resources of the South; they would have to get loans from foreign countries if they had to fight the South. Those who wanted the tax levied realized that no foreign country would assist them in forcing the southern states to stay in the union, especially when they found out how unfair the tax was, so they appealed to them for the loans by claiming they were trying to end slavery- which was not true.

They were not opposed to slavery at all; they realized that slavery was a valuable contribution to making the economy function. MANY, many countries world-wide utilized slavery -better known as indentured servants (people who traded their labor for their means of survival- housing, food, etc.).

If you knew history, you would know that slavery has always been an important part of national economic stability- all over the world. Someone has to do the work. Right now, China and many other countries have a ‘forced labor’ sector doing the work. If no one does the work, everyone suffers.

In America, people who work have to pay a tax on their wages. That tax pays the interest on the loans the government gets to pay for all the social service programs, as well as the many other things the country has to borrow money for in order to afford to provide for us all. You could even say that the common worker today is very much like the indentured servant of yesterday- they are having to support others, as well as themselves, on the labor they provide to an employer. 150 years ago, the same structure was happening, although the living conditions may not have been as good for some of them.

Most slave owners took very good care of their investments (their workers) because they knew that their workers labor directly affected the prosperity of the entire estate. Those owners that were abusive were not the norm- they were the exception.

There were many black slave owners. Proportionally, the number of slaves owned by black slave owners far exceeded those owned by white slave owners. White slave owners also tended to educate their workers, and teach them trades, whereas black slave owners tended to just use them as laborers. All of this is documented, although it has been removed from public school educational textbooks.

The reason for the removal of the true historic facts is a blatant attempt by those wishing to re-write history to serve their purpose of later fomenting division. It is one of the tools used to manipulate and control people.

So, perhaps, Ms. Helm, you need to actually go find out the facts before you act on your misconceptions about how ‘unfairly’ others have treated you. The only reason there is ‘generational poverty’ is because there is little to no effort by those ‘stuck’ in it to change it.

Bottom line: we are all in this together. It is up to each individual how they want to live, and that choice affects the whole nation.

If we value what we have, it is up to each of us to do our best to make sure we are self-reliant. Otherwise, those who want to destroy our nation will cause as much division as they can in order to do so.

That is why it is important- critical, actually – that people of all color stand united as a nation. There is no room for ‘division’ in a nation that chooses to stand strong. A united nation takes care of each individual by allowing each person the opportunity to contribute to the whole.

Those that prefer not to contribute in America have been offered programs to help sustain them, unlike many other countries. So perhaps it is not in one’s best interest to bite the hand that feeds one.

SOMEONE is paying for all the services offered to ‘low income families’- and that ‘someone’ is the American worker.

So please stop expecting more ‘freebies’. They are not free; they are being paid for by those who chose to work.

It would be really appreciated if a good portion of those receiving benefits, who have not previously contributed tax-wise, would go to work (either as a self-employed person, or as an employee) and would then contribute to the whole instead of just constantly- generationally- draining the coffers.

Do you actually think that these benefits would be available to the ‘generational poor’ once the country has been destroyed? Do you think your ‘masters’ will cover the costs of your survival when you chose not to contribute to their pocket?

Once America falls, and is no longer a free sovereign nation determining her own fate in the world, her people will become part of a One World Government, whose overlords will dictate over all. They will not be kind to those who chose not to contribute to their needs.

The only way to avoid this is to unite, as a people, and do everything one can to protect what we have. A free sovereign nation is a much better alternative than one that is enslaved and has no voice in the individual’s choices.

So put down your protest signs, and examine what is it that you are good at, and figure out a way to use those skills to make a living. There is available, at this time, the opportunity for anyone to learn new skills. And here, in America, anyone can take those skills and put them to good use making a living and helping others do the same. That is how to make a nation strong and improve the lives of many.

 

 

 

 

then again, those planning this FEMA event may just be curious as to how many people become alerted to it, and then won’t do anything at all (until some later time). Maybe they are trying to find out how widespread the news gets about such an exercise… That way, it makes those who were alerted look like ‘loons’, so less people will pay attention thereafter…and be better able to be caught off guard later.
who know?

%d bloggers like this: